The Trial Of King Richard The Third - The Prosecution (6)
Loading...
1,507
Uploader Comments (valentinejay)
Top Comments
-
well, they are not a red Herring; afterall, the princes would of course have been found, and it would confirm that they indeed died c.1483-1484.
that said, I do agree that that the discovery-on its own-doesn't prove Richard III's guilt.
-
If the bones could be proved by DNA to indeed be those of the boys,it still dont prove the guilt of Richard-or anyone else.The bones are a red herring....
see all
All Comments (5)
-
my gosh.. she was so oooo much a lady.. the dr. that witnessed.. so nice to see that we dont see it much at all any more.
Loading...
why has nobody brought up the the occassion on june the 8th 1483, when the evidence of a bishop was brought forward that edward iv had already been married when he married elizabeth woodville and so the children were illegitimate.
secretpigeon 7 months ago
@secretpigeon I believe that it is given later in evidence.
valentinejay 7 months ago