Me Versus God, Part VI: God Debunked

Let's just cut to the chase, shall we?

For the same reasons we can assert the non-existence of Santa Claus, we can assert the non-existence of God.

For more information on psychological models for religious belief, check out:

Informational Influence:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1A9vrsw6Hw

Insufficient Justification:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkJc6c3nKMw&feature=related

Confirmation Bias:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoCqftOYHX4&feature=fvw

Category:

Education

Tags:

• atheism
• god
• debunked

[Greyhound1405]

What happened to part 1?

[AntiCitizenX]

@Greyhound1405

Part I is the Noah's Ark stuff, but the video was eventually remade into the better version you see now.

[misken101]

type this

Miracles in Nigeria 13 - Raising the Dead

[AntiCitizenX]

@misken101

Do you honestly believe that video is legitimate? Because that would make you an embarrassingly gullible idiot.

[AntiCitizenX]

@CartesianTheist

Since you apparently read the only first sentence of my comment and abruptly stopped, allow me bring you up to speed:

"I made a tentative inference based on a lack of physical evidence that justifies me in operating under an assumed conclusion."

And if this is the representative quality of your attention span, I'm through talking to you. You are officially a complete fucktard if all you do is ignore what is being said and insert your own little fantasy words.

[philopolymath]

Oh you did make MANY GREAT points on the obtuse hysteria and psychopathy of belief...

But throwing the baby out with the bath water is equally hysteric.

[philopolymath]

Other options for Creation from nothing are valid and logically consistent.

1. Hologram electric-simulation accords exactly to data.

Again it's all rather simple elegant and easy for common man to understand...

Well common sensed men anyway. like Tesla & Walter Russell...

[philopolymath]

Argument from ignorance flaw..

In late 1480 a man came to UNDERSTAND the laws of Nature such as pertains to HOT air rising.

HE had NO evidence but KNEW man would and could "Fly" in "Machines" one day.

At the time his was a classic "argument from ignorance"

Which is valid ONLY IF IGNORANT.

Like you.

[philopolymath]

Continued..

Denial of evidence of our existence is a social problem not scientific.

DATA exists...

3. Our ability to correctly interpret the DATA is irrelevant to it's character or source and offers no support to actuality of fact unless the interpretation is correct.

4.Because current science has it's head up it's ass is not to say it may wake up one day.

5. God was PROVED by verifiable lab standards by perhaps THEE MOST COMPETENT SCIENTIST/INVENTOR EVER....NIKOLA TESLA.

Walter Russell 1927

[philopolymath]

Well there are a couple of fatal flaws in the logic...

1. What does debunking ALL Religions have to do with the existence of a God

Proving ALL air guitarist are fake must mean there are NO real talented guitarists.

2.Yes we should expect ALL empirical evidence to be traced to it's CAUSE.

We have abundant DATA but have not ATTRIBUTED it to a source as yet.

Of course the FACT that we HAVE CONSCIOUSNESS OF data AND OUR ABILITY TO COLLECT AND CONSIDER IT SEEMS INSUFFICIENT TO PROVE A creator!

[shadowknigth95]

@Elhardt More like:.

theism = Ignorance and Denial of actual evidence.

[BjornSeverinLarsen]

 Awsome

[BjornSeverinLarsen]

@Elhardt You are absolutely right. We know NOTHING about other dimensions and states of reality. How is it that you know more than the rest of humanity? How will you spread you're amazing knowledge about these things with the rest of us, who occupy this matrial reality. I enjoy you're ignorance and denial commnet. Denial of what? Something that we can't experience and ignorance of something unexperienced. In such an instance I find it helpfull to be ignorant and to deny it untill prooven.