Ken Ham: Proof-Positive of Evolution?

I can't help but think of capuchin monkeys when I see Ken Ham!

(Song is "Going Crazy" by Squeeze)

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• ken
• ham
• evolution
• creation
• creationism
• capuchin
• monkey
• squeeze
• satire
• humor

[blackplatypus]

On behalf of Australia, I feel I need to apologize for Ken Ham.

At lest we weren't the ones who brought you Ray Comfort!

[DionysusVoice]

@blackplatypus :D

[DionysusVoice]

Ye gawds, I need to check the comments on my videos more often . . .

Coolvideo (and others like you), fair warning: Although I believe in free speech, I am also an enemy of blatant disinformation. Baseless assertations WILL result in the comment being turned into spam on my channel. If you want to avoid this, then add the words "I believe" before your insane and inane fantasies.

Thank you.

[wizardbrandon]

The missing link!

[TheEarthFirst]

@blackplatypus - alot of people seem to think Comfort is from Australia also. New Zealand. I know of a New Zealander atheist on the net that hangs his head about it.

[killgriffinnow]

0:16 Duhh! Of course Ken dosen't look like a monkey! Anyone can tell he is the one on the left!!!!

[Utahraptor2003]

I'm going to report this video, to YouTube, right now! It's offensive to monkeys, because it's calling them stupid, when their intelligence is actually much higher than Ken Ham's! However, they do, indeed, look much the same, in terms of their physical appearances, though. However, when you're talking about their IQ, the capuchin monkey is obviously much more intellectually superior.

[cotton9386]

he may or may not look like the monkey, the only thing that is indisputable is the monkey is much more intelligent

[danning1]

@blackplatypus It's okay. Steve Irwin sort of cancels out Ken Ham. Too bad the former is dead and not the latter! :-D

[wolfsige]

You are doing the monkey a great injustice I think its Iq may be vastly superior

[Genechanger]

@Diomedsspear quote: "There are NO Transitional fossils for a trilobite"

Please tell me where it says that?

quote: "Many things have been proven wrong throughout history that had once been taught in textbooks. Such as the the thought that the earth was the center of the universe."

I wonder which book that was in and which organisation forced people to believe it?

Oh yes! it was the bible and it was chritianity who enforced it long after science scholars had rejected it. I rest my case.

[Diomedsspear]

@Genechanger Your not getting what I said. I said that the fossils from the cambrian period popped up out of nowhere fully formed and complex without any ancestral fossils to back them up. There are NO Transitional fossils for a trilobite for example.

Many things have been proven wrong throughout history that had once been taught in textbooks. Such as the the thought that the earth was the center of the universe. So just because it's in the textbooks doesn't prove anything.

[Genechanger]

@Diomedsspear If you extrapolate forwards to a time when higher animals were evolving, with much longer reproductive cycles of many years, then the Cambrian period equates to many hundreds of millions, if not billions of years. Ample time for evolution to take place.

As for using the Gand Canyon as evidence of the Flood. Anyone with even a Junior school knowledge of geology can see that The Gand Canyon was caused by the slow erosion over thousands of years by the Colorado River. It is textbook.

[Genechanger]

@Diomedsspear Quote: "the species in it [the Cambrian Explosion] didn't slowly come into existence, they jumped in fully formed and complex."

I would be interested in your sources for this statement. Everything I have read over many years does postulate a Rapid evolution, in evolutionary terms, but still a one that follows what would be expected. Small changes leading to eventual new species development.

Remember the extremely short reproductive cycles of the Cambrian Life at the time. Cont'd.