Facing the Sixth Extinction
Uploader Comments (TheHatefulDead)
Top Comments
-
How many humans might die? All of us. I think that fact that our dependancy on other ecosystems cannot be overempasized. We're busy farming, fishing, fighting, and fucking our way to our own extinction at breakneck speed. If we don't start getting control of our numbers and how we share the earth with other life, we won't need to worry about anything anymore. Earth will carry on without us just fine.
-
We don't even have poor management of our resources on this planet, we have no management at all. It's the economic predators that owns and suck the life out of this world, producing only junk for sale for the benefit of their bank acounts. We need other leaders and other guidelines if we want to survive this mess.
All Comments (59)
-
haha all this overpopulation garbage was started by a global elite to start a green movement which doesn't even help the human agenda, its only meant to shut down independency through out the united states so they can profit overseas with cheap labor, and while all the environmentalists support these bureaucrats, the real environmental problems still exist like GMO foods, Fluoride, arsenic, and other toxic chemicals in the water, and genetic engineering.
-
They've been referring to it as the 6th extinction' for years, at least 10 years ago I first read of it. People are complaining here like the person who made this video just made up the whole extinction thing. .Look-To someone who's read about the environment, animals wiped out, oceans & forests killed etc. for decades, it's hard to take anti-environment types seriously when they make it obvious they never cared about it anyway, much less studied it or bothered learning anything for themselves
-
Why are you so sure the humans killed the megafauna ? I always though it was the climate change
-
@OrchidRa or use a a very thick condom
-
Funny how they emphasized that this is a problem, but never explained exactly what will happen, and how mass extinction will cause billions of people to die.
@OrchidRa I agree. The best solution is not to consume less or reduce our individual footprint (though those help), but to STOP BREEDING. The population is growing exponentially. Think we can shrink the footprint per person exponentially to compensate? Hell no! Stop breeding, and even shrink the population , and problem solved.
-
eww, environmentalism is what you have to say in the face of total ecological collapse? Yo are an idiot.
Nature does not kill itself or if would have never gotten of the ground. Yes there is death in nature, because that is the way it must be for life to continue. Organic Nature is simply life. So what exactly is your problem?
-
Maybe this sounds odd but I'm all in favor of this. Homo Sapiens has grown far too big for its britches. The earth will recover and life will be just as diverse then as it is now. This will sound even stranger: I think that humans, as a collective are aware of this but we deny the reality of it. I strongly suggest everyone read "The Denial of Death". As a species we are bright but very immature.
-
@TheHatefulDead @12345combination: Y'all's science words is sexy.
-
eww, environmentalism. You guys are dead set on bringing humans back to the jungles and caves.
How could anyone think that you will live on through the life that eats your remains? Your circle of life mentality of caring for the entire circle is inhuman I feel.
Isn't it true that natural selection has resulted in our domestication of the environment? Isn't it also true that it is nature which kills it's self. We are not derailing the process dear, we are the process.
-
Ergo Proxy showed mass extinction. Was it fiction? Yeah. But it's a step in a direction of thought most people don't want to face. A world where the only way to survive is to make giant bio domes, and to step outside is death. What startled me was going from predictions of 1,000 years to 100, now a mere 30 years! Most predict mass fresh water shortages in the next decade!
It should be noted that calcitic cosmopolitan marine invertebrates are the organisms that are used to correlate stratigraphic successions and determine which extinction events constitute a mass extinction. Therefore it is not applicable to compare the extinction of megafauna or insects, which are usually not preserved in the fossil record, to previous mass extinctions because there is too little data available to compare them on those grounds.
12345combination 1 year ago
@12345combination
While it is generally true that cosmopolitan organisms w/calcitic skeletal elements are important in biostratigraphy, notable exceptions that jump quickly to mind are graptolites, conodont elements, diatoms and palynomorphs such as acritarchs & pollen. All of these are of importance in the temporal resolution & correlation of stratigraphic succession & the biotic events recorded therein.
My differentiation of the Pleistocene extinction was in response to your mention of it.
TheHatefulDead 1 year ago