The Great AIDS Debate (1994) - Excerpts Part 2
Uploader Comments (sadunkal)
Top Comments
-
hiv dosent exsist
All Comments (32)
-
@hitcan79 It's Gallo with the blood of my friends on his hands, not Duesberg, whose science is reliable, unlike Gallo's rewrites and theft. Stop the tests and chemo-killing based on medical profiling.
-
It's Math!
-
Man, I cannot believe how brainwashed doctors are! Drug companies tell them one thing, and they whole-heartedly accept it as scripture! A drug like Vioxx comes along, kills 50,000 people, and doctors act like nothing happened!
-
“A total of 172 participants died [169 who had taken some AZT, 3 who had only taken placebo]...The results of Concorde do not encourage the early use of zidovudine in symptom-free HIV-infected adults.
Concorde Coordinating Committee. Concorde: MRC/ANRS randomised double-blind controlled trial of immediate and deferred zidovudine in symptom-free HIV infection. Lancet. 1994 Apr 9; 343(8902): 871–81.
also google.....AZT LABEL
-
@hitcan79 Death rates were droppng BEFORE the drugs were introduced and NONE of the drug manufacturers claim their products improve clinical health or longevity.
NONE of them. Gee...you must have "forgot" that too. You virus of mass destruction cultists sure are "forgetful"
-
@hitcan79 Honey....I have SCIENCE to back me up. You only have juvenile name calling and "forgetfulness"
-
@hitcan79 Microbes don't KNOW if someone is straight or gay you idiot. If something isn't spread btw heterosexuals it isn't with gays either.
-
@hitcan79 DUH! You sure are "forgetful"
google....Duesberg vindicated « HIV/AIDS Skepticism
"In this connection, it’s worth noting too that Duesberg’s criticism of inflated AIDS-death numbers for South Africa, suppressed from Medical Hypotheses, has been vindicated by publication in a peer-reviewed, PubMed-abstracted journal
[Medical students in Africa need not fear HIV, 2010/05/31 ; REPRINT of Galletti & Bauer, 2010/06/03].
-
@hitcan79 Stop just mindlessly repeating whatever BS you read on the Ministry of Aidstruth. There are ZERO scientists on the board and they're funded by the companies whose products they promote.
You are an internet marketers wet dream.
You haveZERO evidence that Gallo's virus exists OR that his imaginary virus is sexually transmitted
-
Sure it may be hard to transmit during straight sex, but dont be so fucking stupid as to think it doesn't happen, half the people commenting in here are just fucking retarded, You can't convince a retard I guess, oh well I'm done talking to fucked up retarded WALLS, To the moron who says he only hears about people dying from aids that are on the drugs, how about you take a look at the info on that, when people started taking HAART and their ARV properly Deaths plummeted from AIDS, fucking ass
I know already that the HIV test doesnt show if one is infected (with what ever) or not, but I have a question : if a healthy woman (no drug addict) has sex with her so called HIV positive husband, would her HIVtest also shows "positive" (while it definitely shown "HIVnegative" before she had sex with her so called "HIV positive " husband ?
Jasinna 2 years ago
As far as I know there is no clear scientific evidence for sexual transmission of "HIV positivity" in regular straight couples.
Google "HIV is More Difficult to Transmit than Most STDs Dr. Nancy Padian, from her 10-Year Study" for some relevant interesting information.
Also google "The Padian Waffle!" and check out the comments too.
sadunkal 2 years ago
I love when James Scutero says to Siegal "Dangerous to you!" right at the very end.
canaan1967 2 years ago
Are you watching the whole thing once again? :)
Well I know that it's interesting... but still...
sadunkal 2 years ago
We need another "Great AIDS Debate" I think.
hivpositivelyfalse 2 years ago 7
Definitely. Any real debate would automatically be great actually. The excuses of the mainstream scientific community are just pathetic, totally anti-scientific...
sadunkal 2 years ago