Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

88 MINUTES REVIEW - FANS TALKBACK

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
4,451
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 7, 2008

WWW.TALKBACKWORLD.NET Fans talkback on the new Al Pacino movie 88 minutes.

Audio excerpt.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (talkbackworld)

  • agree with ya, the movie was just AVERAGE not AWFUL! But whats your problem with the new actors? who are you to judge about their acting? Don't Compare them with Al Pacino cause Al had alot of experiences that's why his acting skill is superb. Every actor has the right to act with Al Pacino and its Al decision to work or not work with them, NOT YOURS! Anyway, most of the movies today sucks and they're just relying on special effects. i prefer watching classic movies:)

    P.S. im an Al Pacino Fan.

  • If a young or new actor is going to be cast with a great actor like pacino, they better be good. If they cast the likes of Gosling when he was new, I wouldn't be complaining. It is about the quality of the people they chose, not the fact they are new or young per se.

  • I Was so exited to Hear this movie was coming out, and I read the review and apearently it is shit! Fuck! 1 star in the sun. Fuck!

    I hope pacino wins a nother oscar befor he dies

  • Yeah it is rather bad.

  • "These young actors dont even deserve to be in a movie with Al Pacino."

    TRUTH

    Example 50 Cent w/ Deniro and Pacino

  • That is just a travesty.

see all

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Dude... Average?! Average?!?! U must have no standards for plot, originality, acting, dialogue, or directing. Even Helen Keller could see this movie is an atomic shit bomb. Pull Pacinos cock from ur throat the scrape his scrotum off ur chin an admit this is a massive shit stain on the wardrobe of cinema. Pacino just needed beer $ and to pay off the mortgage on his atrocious weave/wig.

  • tht razzie nomination was uncalled for

    it ws really unnecessary wat did they mean by it culdn't they find five worst actors than Al tht year

    wat lame publicity for awards

  • P.M.G. - get it poppin

  • The end of this movie was lousy. Al is a freak. And what's with his hair? Lee Lee Sobieski can't act her way out of a paper bag. Lame ass movie! Al just got a Razzie nomination for worst actor in this turd.

  • Does anyone know the song in the beginning of 88 minutes, it goes "now throw your hands up if you came here to party, put some drink in your cup come on, have a shot with me" it when hes in the bar?

  • and to be fair i thought the asain girl actor at the start was pretty good but she didnt say much after giving him the cookies.

  • i think they clearly spent like their Whole budget on al pacino and the $5 left went on some cord and pullies. lol.

  • i just think it was a pretty crap film but just about worth watching and i think the films makers did this on peropous was probably easy to make all the other actors probably cheap and crap and no real effects cost all u need is al paciano and u will make a half decent profit. thats what i think neway

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more