My thoughts on Climategate, Darwin/Hitler connection, and why ID fails to me
Uploader Comments (HoustonAtheist)
All Comments (38)
-
@ELMOcall911Newton was part of a secret society, is gravity now called into question? Crick never said that.
-
I would have to disagree with you on Royalty being a good example of selective breeding. The main concern with royalty is preservation of a bloodline with little to no concern of traits.
Darwin debunked the core Nazi ideology long before they infested the world.
It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but rather the one most responsive to change.
- Charles Darwin
-
The clues are leading to a whistle blower b/c the emails seemed to have come from the intranet. (Company only information).
Also the East Anglia Scientists responded yes those are our emails but are taken out of context. They admitted it.
Either way the thought of a carbon tax blows my mind. I think our governments are conspiring and I dont like it.
-
the mideval warm period would be in the 1400s the holocen optimum was before. Just wanted to make that correction.
-
You dont ever wonder why they dont talk about real pollution?You know why they tax people by the mile who drive a car? Carbon dioxide is made from natural process'. Like burning and breathing..Cars emit carbon monixde which is 1 molecule short of oxegen. Which is lighter and not a greenhouse gas. What about methane? Thats a real greenhouse gas.Why is carbon dioxide the enemy? More c02 is released from the Ice is the earth warms. Co2 doesnt trigger the warming its a side effect of warming.
have you considered this Darwin had connections to many secret society and by having so His idea was "made" much more popular and if you had read some of his earlier writing it literrally sound that he is going against his own theory's. Francis Crick THE FOUNDER OF DNA literrally claimed that our DNA is far complex to have evolved randomly, Research Alan Alford pointed out WE HAVE 200,000 years missing in the evolutionary time scale if you go by Darwins standard...
ELMOcall911 1 year ago
@ELMOcall911 not really. Your argument is tripe and speculation. I took the time to read up on what you stated and find sources. Francis Crick purposed that life could have been planted here by aliens. But, he also was out spoken on Creationism he joined a group of other Nobel laureates who advised that, "'Creation-science' simply has no place in the public-school science classroom."
HoustonAtheist 1 year ago
And about Darwin. If a person changes there view due to finding evidence that their prior views are wrong is a good thing. Its when someone believing things and they will never change their minds even when a gross amount of evidence is to the contrary. It is then I no longer trust that persons objectiveness to the pursuit of truth.
HoustonAtheist 1 year ago
Do you know where i could find the video where Pat Robertson says those controversial comments about Dover?
truckcompany 2 years ago
I never found the video clip of it. But, if you google Pat Robertson Dover. The first link is the Fox News report on it.
HoustonAtheist 2 years ago