HOW did the camera follow the lander

This is public domain footage of a lunar lander taking off of the moon.
I think we went to the moon,,,, since we left stuff behind *.

By seeing this footage I think we had help and were told not to come back.

I believe this footage could not have been filmed with the equipment available to the them.
As you can see it 'tracks' and zooms in to the lander.... when NO one was left on the moon.
The only way that could have been accomplished (at that time) would be if a person or
someone was controling the camera, they didn't have a tracking camera on that filght.
.....
CAN SOMEONE EXPLAIN TO ME HOW THIS COLOR FOOTAGE WAS FILMED?
...
*= I know all of the refelectors and 'evidence' of our landings could have been placed there without
man setting foot on the moon. Could have been dropped by drone, rocket etc.
The distance reflectors are the 'biggest' remaining proof of man on the moon....
If Voyager had a reflector would this prove that man was on Voyager when it was out past pluto?
....
What has been hidden on the back side of the moon was not known by humans until the lunar missions!
.....
Why haven't we been back?

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• moon
• hoax
• lander
• apollo
• lunar
• questions
• evidence
• landing
• launch

[krisdevalle]

@DERRUFO360 You fucking moron - look up Apollo 10. It tested the engine, it just didn't land.

Look, I know it must be fun to say stupid shit all the time and never check it, but the progression from Apollo 1 to Apollo 11 tells a story of tests, rehearsals, and basically a step by step procedure that led to the moon landing.

Ignorant fucks like you could learn a lot if you just read about the preceding Apollo missions. Why don't you? Just try it.. for once.

[YDDES]

@DERRUFO360 How would "training flights to Moon" be executed according to You? Apollo 8 orbited Moon. Apollo 10's LM made a descent and restart without actually landing. The astronauts trained for hundreds of hours in simulators.

What more would they have done before landing?

Why not "engine re-start and success-- each time"? The engines had been extensively tested. The fuels were hypergolic. No ignition system needed, the fuel ignited when the two components blended.

[YDDES]

@HoodwinkedbyanAngel Honestly, can You take a picture of the stars with the same settings on the camera (aperture and exposing time) as when You photograph a sunlit landscape? Can You???

[YDDES]

@DERRUFO360 First. Please, give a scientifical reason why we should spend a lot of money going on flying people to the moon or up in high orbits. What's to gain?

Second. Armstrong didn't escape from a LM prototype or anything like that. It was a LLTV, a pilot training vehicle with a turbo jet, not rocket engine. The only resemblence to a LM was it's four legs. Not even designed and built by Grumman, which built the LM. Check the facts!

[YDDES]

@centurion180ad Where do You have that video filmed over the moons night side (totally black surface)?

Actually, most of the films showing the other spacecraft was filmed with a 16 mm filmcamera. That's the cause of the seemingly fast speed.

[YDDES]

@centurion180ad I'm quite qualified to have an opinion on if it's dangerous to fly combat missions in war. Do You know how many pilots and other crew members have died in war? Are You qualified? Have You ever piloted an aircraft? I have.

What do you know about the astronauts? Neil Armstrong, for example, was a well known pilot long before he joined Apollo. He fought in Korea and was one of the pilots who flew the X-15 and several other experimental aircraft. Why would he be scared, like You?

[HoodwinkedbyanAngel]

@centurion180ad YEA....GAD DAMIT ... I FEEL THE SAME WAY screw all the bullshit...]

``` about the moons reflective bla bla ...

Any reflex can take a 2 second picture of earth or the stars ...

``` wtf .50 billion dollars & no picture of earth W/STARS ? NASA CAN SUCMYKOK ~

``` & I hold An A&P and 9 other fed and state lic... so if U dont agree KISSmyASS

[centurion180ad]

@YDDES You are a *daft* jackass.

Apollo photography in particular question is of LEM & Command Module allegedly orbiting Luna over its Dark Side, both independently T.V. videoing each other.

A T.V. camera does not expose film; it produces a SIGNAL that contains its images. NEVER in *any* Apollo T.V. video or still photograph is a star, planet or Milky Way visible.

This is impossible.

A cheap ass hand video, will photograph stars at night.

[centurion180ad]

@YDDES You have not flown in combat where death is immediate in proximity.

You are not qualified to have an opinion on this matter.

I know those queer school boys didn't walk on the moon. They are overpaid CRIMINAL actors playing make believe. That explains their teenage chatter, at 1 point the 2 jackasses are SINGING.

SOME of those crooks had military experience means that had they ACTUALLY been on Luna, they’d know damn well how proximately dangerous of a situation they were in.

[krisdevalle]

@DERRUFO360 But humans do go in the Van Allen Belt.

The astronauts in the space station go through it every day.

I thought I told you this. Why am I telling you again?

They go through the South Atlantic Anomaly, every day, which is part of the VAB.

I am not lying. You can look it up.

Look it up and find out if I am lying. Please. Why would I?

[pipercub123456]

@DERRUFO360 ..I can see you're not your average truther. you do have a way with words,infact I'd bet the farm that you're a scientist and a very good one at that..however I don't agree with your math skills,, for you certainly can add TROUBLE::divide ATTENTION::and most of all multiply IGNORANCE. I have to leave now, but its been a treat reading your comments, as too your complete lack of familiarity with the Apollo missions,this we won't speak of again..no need for a reply....THX

[DERRUFO360]

kris i have to go do some stuff..but the point is-- til humans go into the van allen belt we dont know what the end result will be-- just because you and a few men from Apollo say they went to the moon and came back ok-- fine= but the absence of humans in space in a big way 40 yrs after apollo is a major reason to wonder what is going on...sorry-- gotta go -- read up on science learning about VAB since 1969 and also the danger to humans from the sun during prolonged periods of travel in space