Theist Vs Atheist Debate: "Does God Not Exist? 2" (Part 2/4)

Video uploaded with permission.

Second classic debate featuring Theists vs. Atheists held on May 8th, 2004 at the Holiday Inn Dearborn, Michigan.

A debate between Hassanain Rajabali and Michael Corey (Theists) and Dan Barker and Richard Carrier (Atheists) on the existence of God. Moderated by Riyaz Datoo.

"Does God Not Exist?" is a series of debates organized by the Tawheed Institute after the September 11 crises with the aim to foster better understanding between people of different religious denominations.

Entire length: 3 hours 30 minutes

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• atheist
• theist
• rajabali
• hassanain
• barker
• corey
• carrier
• god
• allah
• jesus
• science
• world
• universe
• cosmos
• big
• bang
• islam

[thesketchydude118]

ugh religious ppl always respond with the same points >_> its truly pathetic that grown adults believe in this bullshit

[TomFynn]

What? Saturn doesn't exist? I wasted my whole life!

[avenuePad]

The theist debaters are rude and obnoxious.

[heathsawyer]

Does God Not Exist? That's the debate, so why believers can never give evidence for god once and for all? because there's no evidence for god period,end of story!!

[loly1969]

if theres god he will appear on the sky at least once a year , god exist n he is talking to us through agents is very suspicious .

why do we have to listen to piss weak human who say god exist ?

[loly1969]

if u dont hv enough evidence suspend ur belief plsss , talk all u can , theres no evidence to prove god exist and he created universe , dont quote science to prove religion is correct ,

[TheAzureSky1]

45:55 "Bring me some material substance. Don't give me rhetoric." The fucking irony isn't even funny.

[9288Savior]

5:15 Priceless face of someone listening to him after speaker says "I will offer Exhibit A for my position that there is no evidence for a God, and that is... this very debate" hahah

[MrP4rker]

The ignorance and smugness of the two theist speakers is incredibly frustrating. I guess I'm used to watching debates with better educated opponents or opponents who are better at presenting arguments instead of just pandering to an audience who's largely on their side. I love to watch Carrier debate but it's hard to watch the other side. It's frankly embarrassing.

.

[nyscholartist]

Fair enough. I was being blunt. But the real point is that his arguments were unpersuasive. For example, it won't do to say that one believes in God because, upon looking at oneself in the mirror, one can infer design. Has Rajabali even studied evolution? Does he know that the evidence for it is excellent? All of the vestigial organs and anatomical flaws in the human body are staring us right in the face. The old watchmaker argument has long been discredited.

[salijanstar]

@nyscholartist ..well u need to learn manners, that is more of a basic need

[salijanstar]

its not insecurity about the existence of God when one come to attend these sessions, rather it is the strengthening of faith that emerge from..its anonymous to love.no body can claim he loves 100%..its more logical to say that the love grows day by day..peace to all atheists who want to seek truth