Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Critical analysis of "Case for a creator" part 3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,769
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 16, 2008

part 3

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Eh. If you're lying for Jesus, it doesn't matter if you're internally consistent.

  • It's funny how they say "Oh the cambrian explosion... that happened 530 millions years ago..." and then try to use that to sell a 6000-year-old earth.

see all

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • How many?!? How many more cute and cuddlies must die for this?

  • Man I'd like to give that Mr. Wells a great big wedgie.

  • I laughed at the lawn analogy.

    You're great man, thanks again.

  • The recent discovery of a 40 million lima surprised me because it looked similar, identical to the lima's of today. Dont get me wrong I believe evolution is fact but i dont think mankind has the full handle on it yet. I find it a genius concept myself the way life can be adapted and changed to fit altared enviroments, it seems to have a law of its own we dont fully appreciate.

  • hahaha i wasnt talking about the citations, but the points themselves. im sorry i "failed to do my proper research." next time i go back 50 million years, ill tell u what i see lol. oh and u asked for an apology, im sorry if i hurt your feelings ExtantD0d0, i didnt mean anything personal by it. i thought you were a guy. i wont leave u any more comments then. u can do a critical analysis on someone else's video, but u cant take a couple comments yourself. ill leave u and your insecurities alone:(

  • 2575810

    there are 5 references at 6:10. have you checked them out? how can you say "u have no proof" if they're citing where they get the information from? you've failed at doing proper research, making your conclusion about this being a "very disappointing video" nothing more than a statement reflecting your personal incredulity.

    its you who owes ExtantDodo an apology.

  • the statement at 3:57 comes with a *reference*. you may wanna check it out before commenting in this fashion.

  • not surprising 6:10 u hav no proof. u r very disappointing with this video. i watched it to get a good foot on disproving case for creator but instead, you've failed me. no, i do not accept your apology.

  • 3:57 or misinterpreted

  • It's amusing that they are showing all these pictures of cambrian fossils and saying it proves life appeared spontaniously, but curiously you dont see fossils of modern fish, or frogs, or reptiles, or mammals.....

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more