Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

JOE STACK IS A HERO

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
315 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 15, 2010

IRS INFO LINK: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_Revenue_Service#History_of_the_IRS
JOE STACK MANIFESTO: http://www.slideshare.net/inlakeshalakin/joseph-stack-manifesto
WHO WAS JOE STACK? IS HE A HERO? WAS HE ANOTHER VICTIM OF THE NAZI GOVERNMENT WE NOW LIVE UNDER? WILL THE GOVERNMENT CHANGE THEIR WAYS AND LISTEN MORE TO "THE PEOPLE"?? PROBABLY NOT...THEY WILL USE THIS AS A SCAPE GOAT TO CONTINUE TO STRIP US OF OUR RIGHTS AND LABEL PATRIOTS.

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (securebox)

  • This whole thing seems suspicious to me, but who knows? I couldn't bring myself to do something like that. Maybe he did crack? I can see why some might, we are being pushed up against the wall. Tracie

  • @jbakersl-Absolutely we are being pushed up against a wall. What happens when you back an animal into a corner??

    Thanks so much for stopping by...I greatly appreciate your input.

    -Todd

  • doing things like this only gives the government the excuse it needs to take away the rest of our rights.... and you have to wonder why his plane hanger was owned by the same people who put radio controllers in planes to drive them without a pilot !! i say he was set up. its way to suspicious

  • @IlluminatiSeer- Hey there my friend! Thanks so much for stopping by. I am honored to have your input. We must all put our heads together to come up with positive...effective ways to fight tyranny. Great to have you on board brother...thanks for taking the time to comment.

    Keep in touch my friend...

    Sincerely, Todd

  • God damn genius!

  • @kludgedude-Why thank you sir!! Glad you stopped by to watch! C'mon back...we'll keep a light on for ya ;->

see all

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Anyone who works for the IRS deserves something bad to happen.

  • Working two to just get by while lazy people get more grocery money and huge tax refunds for not working. FUCK the IRS and I am still paying those clowns. Do I pay rent or taxes.

  • What is the definition of[[ INCOME ]]in the 16TH Amendment?

    Hint; It isn't your INDIVIDUAL private LABOR.

    Example: If I came to an agreement to work(my private individual labor)for 10 chickens an hour do I have to pay an income tax on those chickens to the irs. answer NO! how could I?Give them 5 chickens of my 10?

    If I came to an agreement to work for 1 troy oz of Gold an hour do I have to pay"income"tax on my labor to the irs.Answer NO! What would I do cut it in half and mail it?

  • Pt.1

    "Trading" my time(private individual labor) for 10 chickens an hour is not " INCOME" as defined in the 16TH AMENDMENT. INCOME IS GAIN, I did not gain anything.

    Income is"derived"from capitol, from labor. [meaning if a business owner has 10 employees and spent 20 dollars after paying them,including overhead,he got 40 dollars back.So he made a"PROFIT".That extra 20 was derived from the labor of his employees.That extra 20 is a "GAIN DERIVED FROM LABOR

  • Pt.2

    INCOME = GAIN = PROFIT

    Lucas v. Earl, 281 U.S.111(1930):

    "The claim that salaries, wages, and compensation for personal services are to be taxed as an entirety and therefore must be returned by the individual who has performed the services which produce the gain is without support...it is not salaries, wages,or compensation for personal services that are to be included in gains, profits,and income derived from salaries,wages,or compensation for personal services."

  • Pt.3

    Conner v. U.S.,303 F Supp.1187(1969):

    "... whatever may constitute income,therefore,must have the essental feature of gain to the recipient. This was true when the 16th Amendment became effective, it was true at the time of Eisner v. Macomber Supra, it was true under Section 22(a)of the Internal Revenue Code of 1938,and it is likewise true under Section 61(a)of the IRS Code of 1954.If there is not gain,there is not income ... Congress has taxed income not compensation."

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more