Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Eyes of Nye - Or how to brainwash US children

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
6,842
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 28, 2008

Cloud-kissing stupidity and scientific dishonesty presented in a Neomarxist propaganda crap from USA (2005).

A duo of female "scientists" shows that human races don't exist, because they can't be identified on the basis of SEVEN (!) DNA markers. In reality, the accuracy of genetic identification rises with the numbers of used markers, because genetic differences among humans lie in their characteristic mutual combination. With the growing number of DNA markers, the accuracy of racial/population classification rises rapidly.
http://www.goodrumj.com/Edwards.pdf

With the use of a sufficient number of DNA markers (something like 400), the accuracy rises to 100%.
http://genetics.plosjournals.org/archive/1553-7404/1/6/pdf/10.1371_journal.pg...

These human clustering studies consistently show that humans are separated into 5 main genetic clusters (Sub-saharan African, Caucasian, Mongoloid, Australoid (Papuomelanesian) and Native American.

When even more markers are used, a more subtle population division can be identified, e.g. between northern and southern Europe.
http://genetics.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-pdf&file=10.1371_j...
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1852743&blobtype=pdf

If 500 000 or more loci are used, even single nations and local groups within nations can be genetically determined.
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/319/5866/1100
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/data/319/5866/1100/DC1/1

As for the alleged low human interracial diversity in comparison with other mammals, this is another myth quoted over and over again. The most probable source for it is an obscure study of Alan Templeton (1998)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1525/aa.1998.100.3.632?cookieSet=...
who compared the diversity of human AUTOSOMAL DNA with ANIMAL MTDNA (the diversity of mtDNA is always several times higher). Since that time it has been confirmed that human interracial differentation is medium-high to high in comparison with other mammals, and thus entirely sufficient for racial classification
http://www.goodrumj.com/RFaqHTML.html
It is lower than in orangutans, chimpanzees and gorillas (whose interpopulation diversification is so high that it approaches speciation), but comparable or higher than in bonobos, big cats and other carnivores, in which traditional racial classification provokes no revisionist tendecies. (What is even more interesting, however, is the fact that despite their higher genetic diversity and more than 1 million years of divergence, great apes have comparable or lower morphological diversity than humans - depending on the combination of used traits.)

SEE MY REVIEW OF CLUSTER STUDIES HERE:
http://booboo.ic.cz/KlastryRasovaKlasifikace.htm
http://booboo.ic.cz/KlastryRasovaKlasifikace2.htm

  • likes, 76 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • How do we brainwash our children? Make them attend church!

  • Instead of bashing a good show like Eyes of Nye, why not make your own videos constructively telling your view of the world on In this case race. You don't have to agree with this show's views, even if you open your mind and heart to it, but be respectful. Even if they are brainwashing people, I think it's for a good cause. Wouldn't you or anyone agree?

see all

All Comments (186)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • So teaching that race means nothing is bad, teaching that we are the only species on earth that has ever discriminated against our own kind on the basis of melanin production, and that no other animal on earth does it, is bad?

  • If you want to coin in the term different "breeds" of humans that would probably work better. Just most people take offense to that, so we use the word race. humans are capable of interbreedale sex ya?

  • @RevolutionNo7

    Because he's a racist and if there's one things racist can't stand it's people saying race doesn't exist or is irrelevant because every racist believes his race is superior and destined by God to dominate all the other inferior races of Earth.

  • So, I don't really understand. Suppose that the information presented in this program is inaccurate, how does that make this propaganda? What do you suppose is the political agenda Bill is trying to push here? What is Bill's motivation for pushing this agenda?

  • @centrum99

    If this is all you will say now, I must say that I am very disappointed.

  • @centrum99

    Is that all the response you're going to give me? ...

    And here it's considered basic textbook material, or main-stream science. You can not spend your life personally verifying every last bit in the textbooks. And as I concluded in my comments above, while there might be some additional details to that knowledge, it holds true for the general population. Which isn't odd at all, as also detailed in my previous comments.

    I thought I'd get some actual mileage out of you.

  • @CrimsonRefractions You have never thought about undertaking your own study of current scientific findings, haven't you? It is much easier to listen to propaganda served on a golden plate in school.

  • @centrum99

    (Race especially is, since we all share a common ancestor not too long ago, probably in the thousands of years only. Making the notion rather absurd.)

  • @centrum99

    Either way, when reading the study you cited, I do not find support for your statement that intra-variance is greater than inter, given the world population. It might hold for some geographically isolated populations, but overall it still does not seem to be a meaningful construct.

    Looking forward to your response.

  • @centrum99

    Seems like a lot of work to properly read into that research. For one I have many questions with the populations they used. Also in their discussion they mainly seem to agree with me. I of course don't deny the presence of certain genetic factors in certain populations, e.g. sickle-cell and whatnot.

    But are you really keeping in mind that the common use of race in humans reflects to people thinking they are a different 'species' of human? With different skills and abilities.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more