BBC Hard Talk (3/3) - Richard Dawkins
Top Comments
All Comments (220)
-
The reporter was actually very good and proffesional. Have never seen Dawkins get stressed up, which he did with this reporter. Seemed to me, somehow, as Dawkins met himself in the reporter, who really could observe Dawkins critically from different angles and perspectives.
...A great opportunity for Dawkins to improve himself even more...
-
This interviewer is trained to disturb, that's why it's called hard talk...
-
This BBC interviewer could be the most stupid man in the world!!!
-
@mcpwns All he tests is Dawkins' patience by misunderstanding or distorting his answers, points and illustrations. The interviewer is an uninformed dolt who's trying too hard.
-
Although the interviewer isn't perfect, he's given Dawkins a much better test than, say, Bill O'Reilly.
-
Yes , the interviewer seems like a defensive choir boy who's desperately trying to save face, after all if he gives credence to Dawkin's views it would shatter his identity like a house of cards.
-
Only believers like the empty headed tin himself would throw such question. Science is progressing as the statistics suggests so, it might one day... HOLD ON HOLD ON, it looks like you have believe in science which will evidently bring in the meaning.. hahahah.. the host should Shut his HOLE UP.
-
BBC asking some weak questions...
-
having watched all 3 parts, it seems to me that the guy performing the interview simply looked up a list of the most common bullshit theist arguments against rationality. he must've forgot about the interview until 10 minutes before when he panicked and jumped onto google.
-
@12Ominous "Science is a doctrine of belief."
that statement is an example of the matter which exits a bull's rectal orifice.
Science is not a religion, a scientist doesn't believe, he brings evidences.
geonaturaleza 6 months ago 66
Anyone who believes in god is a fucking retarded idiot
yahoopig 6 months ago 52