Has anybody else noticed that the media stubbornly refused to fairly report improving economic news in 2003 and 2004, as President Bush prepared for a tough re-election battle, while the same media...
Has anybody else noticed that the media stubbornly refused to fairly report improving economic news in 2003 and 2004, as President Bush prepared for a tough re-election battle, while the same media is now euphorically jumping on any sign of economic improvement with President Obama in the White House? Just a coincidence, I'm sure.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
FACT: The media loves Obama and will gladly spin, manipulate and even lie to make sure that he is put in the best possible light. With Bush, they would do the same thing to make sure that he was put in the worst light. Smart people know the biased media has no credibility and has become a propaganda machine for their Glorious Leader.
For the record, the GOP controlled both houses of Congress for 4 years and 5 months during Bush's tenure. For the first 1 year and 7 months it was split with the Dems controlling the Senate(Jim Jeffords). For the final two years the Dems controlled both houses.
Also for the record, national unemployment was at 4.5% when the Democrats took control of Congress and the budget.
The liberal media is very afraid of being labeled a racist so they treat Obama with kiddy gloves because they are absolutely terrified of being labeled as such.
What they do not realize is that they are being racist by acting such a way around Obama just because he happens to be multiracial.
Correct. What happened to Don Imus with his "nappy-headed" comment is fresh in the minds of the media. No one wants to have their lives destroyed by Al Sharpton and the rest of the minority extortion groups.
But the media also make things worse with their hyper-liberal partisan bias. They don't have the guts to stand up to the Sharptons and then they add to the problem by being massively biased in favor of every liberal cliche on earth.
If we had truth, there would be no liberals or need for them. I mean-we have a President who would lie to the pope about abortion!!!! How low can you go,Mr President?
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Smart people know the biased media has no credibility and has become a propaganda machine for their Glorious Leader.
What's even worse is that they let him claim that all of this is W's fault.
Also for the record, national unemployment was at 4.5% when the Democrats took control of Congress and the budget.
What they do not realize is that they are being racist by acting such a way around Obama just because he happens to be multiracial.
Ironic no?
If they act normally they are racist.
But act racist and they are not.
But the media also make things worse with their hyper-liberal partisan bias. They don't have the guts to stand up to the Sharptons and then they add to the problem by being massively biased in favor of every liberal cliche on earth.
I mean-we have a President who would lie to the pope about abortion!!!!
How low can you go,Mr President?