Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Economic Reporting: Then and Now

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
18,962
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 8, 2009

Has anybody else noticed that the media stubbornly refused to fairly report improving economic news in 2003 and 2004, as President Bush prepared for a tough re-election battle, while the same media is now euphorically jumping on any sign of economic improvement with President Obama in the White House? Just a coincidence, I'm sure.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 10 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (FrankStrategies)

  • Great video. But it's "the economy shrank".

    (Not "srunk", which is the past participle.)

  • As an admitted grammar geek, I wondered about that. I even changed it to "contracted" before changing it back. Oh well.

Top Comments

  • MSNBC, CBS, NBC, & ABC employees are all carrying pom-poms & chanting, "Yes We Can!"

  • Whats funny is Obama PROMISED the unemployment would not go over 8% if congress passed his "stimulus" package. Its now at 9.6% is ANYONE reporting that??!!!

see all

All Comments (47)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • DUMB!!!!!!!!!!

  • FACT: The media loves Obama and will gladly spin, manipulate and even lie to make sure that he is put in the best possible light. With Bush, they would do the same thing to make sure that he was put in the worst light.

    Smart people know the biased media has no credibility and has become a propaganda machine for their Glorious Leader.

  • Pretty much says it all doesn't it? Part of the reason is because they want you to be in a constant state of panic.

    What's even worse is that they let him claim that all of this is W's fault.

  • For the record, the GOP controlled both houses of Congress for 4 years and 5 months during Bush's tenure. For the first 1 year and 7 months it was split with the Dems controlling the Senate(Jim Jeffords). For the final two years the Dems controlled both houses.

    Also for the record, national unemployment was at 4.5% when the Democrats took control of Congress and the budget.

  • Because there was not a Republican Congress for 8 years. Pelosi and Reid have been in control for almost 3 years,

  • Correct. What happened to Don Imus with his "nappy-headed" comment is fresh in the minds of the media. No one wants to have their lives destroyed by Al Sharpton and the rest of the minority extortion groups.

    But the media also make things worse with their hyper-liberal partisan bias. They don't have the guts to stand up to the Sharptons and then they add to the problem by being massively biased in favor of every liberal cliche on earth.

  • The liberal media is very afraid of being labeled a racist so they treat Obama with kiddy gloves because they are absolutely terrified of being labeled as such.

    What they do not realize is that they are being racist by acting such a way around Obama just because he happens to be multiracial.

    Ironic no?

    If they act normally they are racist.

    But act racist and they are not.

  • For future reference, you'll want to use "you're" as in, "you are" not "your" as in "your grasp of spelling is poor."

  • your retarded

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more