The reason we have these abstract concepts and ideas in terminology is because without them it would be extremely difficult and inconvenient to talk about them with other musicians. I don't care if you use the wrong term, but if you throw around big words to look smart (like I thought you were doing) then you look ignorant to the ppl that do know better. That's why I lol'd. lol
There aren't many videos of true polyrhythms on Youtube (most polymetrics are mistakenly called polyrhythms), but Mike Mangini has a few videos showcasing some actual polyrhythms, and Virgil Donati and a few others. If you're really interested send me a pm and I'll give you a few links.
No, it depends on what type of polyrhythm you play. A 3 over 2 polyrhythm takes 2 beats to resolve for instance. It doesn't have to sound abstract, and depending on the listener, it can sound very musical. Or you can play something extremely disjointed like 17 over 19, but in those cases it probably won't be musical to most people.
Thank you for finally looking it up. I guess you did care about not being ignorant. In that case, I'll help you clear up a few things. First of all, what Virgil does in my layering video is called "polymetric" because he's playing the same time value (16th notes) but playing simultaneous rhythmic phrases of different lengths. They do cycle and resolve like polyrhythms, but the difference is that polyrhythms do NOT take the same note value.
Großes Kino, weiter so =)
Zildjianrocks 2 months ago
Sah ihn in Hüls 2010............................unglaubliches Solo auch dort.
Dieser Mann ist ganz weit vorne!!!!
Auf`m Boden bleiben und weiter stilvoll "zu-inken" lassen Tim!
slicegolfjunk 1 year ago
hi tim!!!
viel liebe grüße aus hagen emst von mir und meinen eltern.
timo
Timbo1231000 2 years ago
gute sache herr husung ;)
inspector gadget hat spaß gemacht zu zocken mit euch jungens ;)
grüße
Marius
90SemperFi 2 years ago
spitzeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
sunnymoon67 2 years ago
Er ist für mich einer der besten schlagzeuger europas wenn nicht sogar der Welt
ubique123 3 years ago
The reason we have these abstract concepts and ideas in terminology is because without them it would be extremely difficult and inconvenient to talk about them with other musicians. I don't care if you use the wrong term, but if you throw around big words to look smart (like I thought you were doing) then you look ignorant to the ppl that do know better. That's why I lol'd. lol
cjcdrums 4 years ago
There aren't many videos of true polyrhythms on Youtube (most polymetrics are mistakenly called polyrhythms), but Mike Mangini has a few videos showcasing some actual polyrhythms, and Virgil Donati and a few others. If you're really interested send me a pm and I'll give you a few links.
cjcdrums 4 years ago
No, it depends on what type of polyrhythm you play. A 3 over 2 polyrhythm takes 2 beats to resolve for instance. It doesn't have to sound abstract, and depending on the listener, it can sound very musical. Or you can play something extremely disjointed like 17 over 19, but in those cases it probably won't be musical to most people.
cjcdrums 4 years ago
Thank you for finally looking it up. I guess you did care about not being ignorant. In that case, I'll help you clear up a few things. First of all, what Virgil does in my layering video is called "polymetric" because he's playing the same time value (16th notes) but playing simultaneous rhythmic phrases of different lengths. They do cycle and resolve like polyrhythms, but the difference is that polyrhythms do NOT take the same note value.
cjcdrums 4 years ago