The Japanese defend themselves and once again She Shepherd complains.
Link with Sea Shepherd's supposed Japanese grappling hook photograph:
http://www.seashepherd.org/news-and-media/2012/01/17/three-sea-shepherd-crewm...
Sea Shepherd complaining Japan defends themselves. Reading a report on Sea Shepherd's website dated 18 January, 2012 (link below) it reads like a comedy show and / or the typical ranting of extreme liberals behaving as minions in a cult.
Remember now it is Sea Shepherd's cultists and vessels that track and attack the Japanese mariners. Sea Shepherd had used lasers on the Japanese. They have vandalized the Japanese vessels with paint and burned their nets. They continue to attempt to snarl the propellers and / or rudders of the Japanese vessels with thick long ropes. They also riddled the decks of the Japanese vessels with broken glass and acid.
Per the cult's website the Japanese have "escalated their aggression." See when you defend yourself, you are aggressive. The Japanese according to Sea Shepherd are throwing "grappling hooks" at their zodiacs.
-
They claim their crew members were hit by iron grappling hooks and one member struck twice in the face with a bamboo pole. Huh?
Guess what? If the cultists were not that close to the Japanese vessel they would have been out of range to be on the receiving end of ejected grappling hooks and bamboo poles. The thinking must be Sea Shepherd has a right to attack the Japanese vessels without the Japanese defending themselves. The nerve of someone defending themselves after being attacked.
The supposed injured according to Captain Kangaroo are:
Brian Race -- age 25, from New York, USA -- face injury from bamboo pole
Russell Bergh -- age 35, from South Africa, a cameraman from Animal Planet (Whale Wars). He was hit in the right arm and shoulder with a grappling hook. Sounds like an occupational hazard.
Guillaume Collet -- age 27, from France, a photographer, was hit in the arm and shoulder with a grappling hook. Coincidently the same injury as the South African cameraman.
The Score:
3 -- Japan
0 -- She Shepherd
Sea Shepherd's hilarious report:
http://www.seashepherd.org/news-and-media/2012/01/17/three-sea-shepherd-crewm...
Note: According to the Japanese ICR (Institute of Cetacean Research) it was Sea Shepherd who used the hooks attached to ropes in an attempt to attach to the whalers protective netting. Sea Shepherd failed in their use of these hooks and most likely these are the hooks that hit their own crew. Not to take responsibility for the injuries they caused their own crew, they blame the Japanese.
As for the bamboo poles: These were used to prevent Sea Shepherd crew from cutting holes in the protective netting on the Japanese vessel. It was Sea Shepherd crew member photographed with a knife approaching the netting.
Please read the correct report about this incident:
http://www.icrwhale.org/pdf/120118ReleaseENG.pdf
嘆願訪問
http://staff.texas-daddy.com/
Photographs: © Copyright: The Institute of Cetacean Research (ICR).
Sea Shepherd "She Shepherd" whale wars Japanese whaling Southern Ocean Antarctic waters Captain Kangaroo Admiral Beauregard Watson The Paulrus cult group girly men coward cultist minions cultists eco terrorist European imperialists attacked by grappling hooks bamboo poles Nihon koku Texas Daddy Tony PropagandaBuster propaganda buster Tony Australian news media
filthy propaganda
DJCake2013 2 days ago
@DTofMN I haven't ignored anything, I haven't repeated you, and I haven't tried to make it look like I've "arrived at it" myself either. I said this, "If it came down to Japan facing a penalty over their ATS violations, they would probably just come to their senses and release the data" not to take credit, but to show that I concurred on what Japan's actions would be in such a scenario. I don't understand what you think I'm "ignoring", but I haven't ignored anything.
122333nic 6 days ago
@122333nic And more ignoring what is plainly written and this time you try repeat what I wrote and try and make it look like you arrived at it yourself..
DTofMN 6 days ago
@beagleboy547 You know, DTofMN (someone who feels it necessary to lash out at others behind a computer) is on here looking for something very specific. You don't need to explain to him why it is you don't want things to suffer. It's best not to feed him. :P
122333nic 6 days ago
@DTofMN "ignore what was plainly written" Uh... I didn't ignore anything about your comment, nor have I in the past. Your comment appeared to me to be void of things deserving to be argued or discussed. If it came down to Japan facing a penalty over their ATS violations, they would probably just come to their senses and release the data. I figured, "For now it seems, but the future is uncertain" would be a nice way to round up our discussion here but apparently not.
122333nic 6 days ago
@beagleboy547 Try going back to school, boy. I never justified killing in the name of evolution. I was showing howq ignorant your claim that because they "have been around longer than us" is some kind of reason not to hunt them.
You realize fruit trees have been around longer than us, so I guess we shouldn't eat them either.
DTofMN 6 days ago
@DTofMN There is no point to argue with a redneck like you. Japanese DO hunt whales AND dolphins AND other ENDANGERED marine species. Your justifying killing these creatures in the name of evolution. Thats like saying im killing in the name of Allah.
beagleboy547 6 days ago
@beagleboy547 And most whale species aren't almost extinct either, in fact none of the species Japan hunts are almost extinct.
So you are against evolution? Why?
DTofMN 6 days ago
@DTofMN Yeah but they aren't almost extinct dumb ass. What if some stronger smarter faster form of people evolved and started killing us? We would be nothing to them. Just like endangered species are to people like you
beagleboy547 6 days ago
@beagleboy547 Yes I am. We kill alligators and crocodiles that have been around a lot longer than whales. And what difference does it make how long ago a species evolved?
DTofMN 1 week ago