135ci VS M3 e92
Top Comments
All Comments (100)
-
bad m3 driver
-
the 1M could do it
-
Now they gotta put up the 1M vs the M3
-
a wise man said: if the turbo spins, bullshit ends
-
@khyron4 the stock M3 quarter mile listed by the company itself is 13.5 seconds. Check it out.
-
yea I'm not sure why every single bmw m3 vs 135i video I watch, the 135i wins. The best I see is the m3 matching the 135i. I thought the m3 was significantly faster?!? wtf?
-
wow, another example of someone who doesn't know how to drive an m3, the coupe typically pulls an 12.8 1/4 mile
-
But I wanna know how both perform on a track!!!
-
@SpeedKlz add 300$ mod to the 135i = rape m3's all day lol. 135i's can get to the low 11's with slicks and a small chip on 91 octane. im sure i can reach the 10's if it had race gas and a good tune.
-
el tio del m3 salio mal
Does not matter. M3 is a V8 with high-revving engine. M3 consistently beats the 135 in a 1/4 mile every single time. I know it because I have two friends with these cars and after the first 50 feet, the M3 r*pes the stock 135 every single time.
A stock 135 runs 13.4 - 13.5 secs while an M3 runs 12.6 - 12.7.
M3 makes 120 HP more and has much shorter and aggressive gearing. The 150 lbs weight difference means nothing.
SpeedKlz 2 years ago 7
Best Motoring has some great track racers, but they s*ck monkey balls in drag racing and produce some of the most inconsistent results imaginable.
The idi*t in the M3 could not drive for sh*t! The M3 is a full second faster than the 135 and runs mid-12s (12.5 - 12.6).
SpeedKlz 2 years ago 3