Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

(14/14) Intelligence Squared - Atheism is the new fundamentalism

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
15,364
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 1, 2009

Part 14 of 14
- Final vote

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • That woman in the crowd who asked Dawkins "When was the last time you was in a church?" obviously hasnt seen or read any of his work, because Dawkins goes to churches all the time to do research like any good scientist would.

  • pre-vote:333+675+389=1397

    end vote:363+1070+85=1518

    what happens? Did some angels vote too?

see all

All Comments (137)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @ilgaizka The moderator mentioned that some 200 people that were in the building had not voted in the pre-debate poll.

  • @ilgaizka : in one of the earlier videos, the chairman mentions that not everyone voted in the pre-vote.

  • This was an amazing debate. I watched all the videos. Thank you for sharing them with the rest of us.

  • This was an amazing debate. I watched all the videos. Thank you for sharing them with the rest of us!

  • If Atheism is fundamentalism than not drinking alcohol is an addiction

  • @nikanj your very right on this, this will be the point in history were people will accept the system that the illuminaty install in society, because everything they tell people to do and obey will have nothing to do with a "god" they will comply, pff idiots

  • Maybe in the future historians will reflect back on this period as a sort of new renaissance or age of enlightenment. When the faiths of the world began to crumble and people began to realise that religion had no place in a rational society of critical thinkers.

  • @marcohorowitz8 I think they did. I was trying to parody the debate process. It's not just about speech points but about substance, which I think the atheists provided amply.

    A "leprechaun/unicorn/tooth-fair­y" argument is perfectly valid in my eyes.

  • @wildheartmuse well said!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more