South Tower Anomalies - Extended

Original NBC 911 footage of South Tower hit is analyzed. 3 videos on the SAME network from the SAME angle depicting the SAME moment in time tell 3 DIFFERENT stories.

This is an updated and extended version of the original "South Tower Anomalies". Several new anomalies have been added, thanks to constructive criticism from YouTubers.

On the no-planes issue, this video is about news fakery, not about the no-planes theory. "September Clues" is the best analysis of the no-planes theory. One does not have to be a "no-planer" to see the fakery. All I know for sure is that something hit the towers and someone doctored the footage.

Created by ThoughCrime7, DJO Productions

Visit:
http://youtube.com/user/ThoughtCrime7
http://youtube.com/user/dayjoborchestra
http://www.DayjobOrchestra.Com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 911
• 9/11
• 2nd
• second
• plane
• south
• tower
• video
• nbc
• cgi
• fake
• editing
• camera
• 2D
• animation

[beggarz]

At 2:30 it sounds like the reporter on the ground starts to say something, then cuts herself short - then says "Oh! Another one just hit! Something else just hit... a very large plane just flew directly over my building..."

Where was this reporter on the ground? On which building?

[ThoughtCrime7]

Ya her first reaction is "oh" - she never saw/heard the plane before it crashed? Then "something" just hit, then "a very large plane" just hit. She should have continued with "A very large plane with angry Arabs who hate our freedoms carrying box cutters" just hit.

[fafnir242]

Okay, thay gray area on the North Tower that's supposedly "the roof" is nothing more than a light patch of smoke. Are you trying to tell us that there was no plane that hit the South Tower? What exactly was the point of this video?

[ThoughtCrime7]

The point is stated at the beginning.

[hammer1165]

this is pure logic, the American people do not respond to logic, only what they see on TV.

[kylejjw]

Your a fkin jk. This video is not saying a plane didint hit the wtc buildings. Its saying that the media made these fake clips of a plane hiting the wtc buildings.

[shaybutta11208]

@Goobelham the resolution was so shitty you could see the background too right?? but the clip with the "good" resolution the background dissappears. Im confused

[Goobelham]

The shots are two different shots, from slightly different angles.

[Goobelham]

@MassacreBlast differing video resolutions.  the resolution is so shitty that you can't even see the plane.

[MassacreBlast]

@kylejjw - Actually there was no plane in one video, then there was a clear shot of one in the next later edited one. How can you go from NO plane to A plane without noticing the obvious logical discrepancy?

[modaclubs]

yes ofcourse you or somebody else

 ( Spiderman?) filmed it from the tip of the spire...... well it confirms only that you are a very very dumb motherfucker

[drusha1]

i''m talking about the tip of the spire approximately 443m

dumb motherfucker inside your pants by the way

[modaclubs]

The empire state b. is only 320 m high you cant film the rooftop of the WTC from there you dumb motherfucker

[drusha1]

footage is taken from empire state building and the difference is due to elevation difference of the ground! we're looking at 30-50 feet difference in the ground level for the two buildings it seems

[imnazhole]

DAMNIT!! I didn't see that either. The World Trade Center buildings were the highest buildings in the world until the Sears tower was built. How that hell did they get that footage??

I always thought I was smart. Thank heaven for truly smart people. No offense people, but I feel as dumb as a baptist minister.

[GGcaptmandrake]

I might add, in regards to the so-called height problem, that the footage appears to be shot from a rooftop, or out of a window, of a building.This look's to be about a quarter of a mile away!