abstinence only vs comprehensive sex education (liberal lies about sex)

http://www.ultrafaction.com/virgin
http://www.ultrafaction.com/act/darkside.html

(1) Liberals say that teen or pre-marital sex is an unchangeable constant in nature, so why teach ANYTHING, if people are just going to screw the same no matter what? And why after saying that boinking is a constant, that it then CAN be changed with the right education such as the so-called "comprehensive" classes? Is it a constant OR variable? It can't be both!

(2) What about the 40% of teens that abstain? The other 60% should emulate THEM, not the other way around!

(3) Boinkers say that virgins are virgins ONLY because they do not "know" sex and do not know what they are missing, so it is easy for them to abstain. So WHY do they say it is so hard for teens to abstain? Sex can not be foreign AND inherent at the same time!

(4) Some liberals say that we must teach safer sex and tell kids to abstain if they don't have a condom. I thought you guys just finished saying that kids won't abstain! Which one is it?

(5) Bristol Palin FAILED in her life and now is trying to pre-ordain the same for all young people. Nerds who break their virginity because they saw it as a way to be cool and feel "normal" do the same thing. They need to prove the entire human race is as weak as they are to make themselves feel better. Some virgins are weak, but not all of us!

(6) "Comprehensive" is a fallacy! If it were not, they'd teach the entire scope of sex and the PAIN that comes with so much pre-marital sex! Sluts are the TRUE sexual slaves; virginity until marriage is TRUE sexual freedom!

(7) The Young Turks (Cenk) say that after random sex, they "feel great"?? If that were the whole story, we'd have built a UTOPIA by now! In the long term, illicit sex gives you an emptiness!!

(8) SOLUTION! Boycott the sex media! if we are not allowed to see which parent companies are marketing sex, in order to not support them, HOW can the liberals say that "If you don't like it, don't support it"???

(9) WHY are there so many people that regret the pre-marital sex that they had yet the left wingers argue that we are infallible super-humans and people always "know what they are doing"?? We are NOT super-humans! The sex media misleads us!

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• virginity
• abstinence
• only
• comprehensive
• sex
• education
• theyoungturks
• Bristol
• Palin
• moral
• consequence

[vanishing446]

The point of sex education isn't to stop people from having sex, its to educate them and show them how to have safe sex. Its not to stop them from having sex. Also, Nerd subculture is associated with sex? You have to be kidding me.

[zelvadrian]

@vanishing446 If people like YOU say that kids are going to boink no matter what, then why teach ANYTHING? And the only safe sex is abstinence until marriage

[vanishing446]

@zelvadrian The reason you teach them is so that they know about STDs and Pregnancy so that they can decide for themselves if thats what they want to deal with. You can't force people not to do things in the privacy of their home, unless you want a police state. And what if one doesn't want to get married? Just because you believe in god doesn't mean that everyone else should live their lives like they do.

[zelvadrian]

@vanishing446 It is pop culture that is imposing its ways on people like me today; not the other way around.

[Sonicisbadazz]

@zelvadrian Define "safe." If you get married and your wife has AIDS, is that going to constitute "safe sex"? What do you mean when you say "safe"?

The potential for heartbreak and disappointment is just as possible IN marriage as out of it, so I'm not sure how emotionally it's "safe" to wait until marriage for sex. (Not that I support people doing it all over the place. I don't.) And physically speaking, that depends on protection and what your partner has STD-wise.

So really, NO sex is safe!

[zelvadrian]

@Sonicisbadazz If we weren't a slut society, very few people would have AIDS so marrying a woman with AIDS would be highly unlikely. Also, if you are against doing it all over the place, then we agree!

[Sonicisbadazz]

@zelvadrian You're using basic rhetoric to argue against something more complicated. Virtually NOBODY wants people doing it all over the place. It's vicious slander to suggest liberals DO want that.

How about addressing my points? You're saying the only safe sex is sex within marriage, but I've shown that it's not guaranteed to be physically safe nor emotionally safe, so wouldn't it be more accurate to say there's not such thing as safe sex PERIOD? (Unlikely does not = guaranteed)

[Sonicisbadazz]

@zelvadrian I'm not really sure how it's doing that if you're still a virgin and making videos defending your views.

Nobody wants comprehensive to skip over the potential heartbreak from having sex too soon. We all know that can happen. But if you think waiting until marriage is somehow going to prevent that pain if you later get a divorce, I think you're living in a dreamworld. Pain is a natural part of human life. Sooner or later we have to learn to deal with it anyway.

[Foroneworldunited]

ONE WORLD UNITED

[zelvadrian]

@YourEverydayMistake If your agenda was "comprehensive" then you'd get into all of the heartbreak and pain from teen sex!! I'm not forcing anything on them! I'm just pointing out liberal lies and I have done TONS of research.