The Big Question - Are ARVs effective for HIV/AIDS - David Rasnick (3 of 6)

First aired on July 3rd, 2005

This program from South Africa asks this question and results in a passionate debate between the two sides: Those who say the ARVs are helpful, and those who say they are toxic and deadly.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• ARV
• HAART
• debate
• big
• question
• rasnick
• discussion
• toxic
• treatment
• therapy
• africa
• south
• death
• sickness
• poverty
• audience
• truth
• results

[nonnenja2281]

"I'll go better than a study"

How pathetic.

[carehappens]

lay out in the sun for a few hours and your cd4 goes way down. also, if you do get your cd4 test do it early in the morning as it will be much higher than it will be in the afternoon.

[SalomeTirza]

Hahahahah ... always the same "out of context" :D! Just like the bible-believers ... hahahahha ....

[amorhombre]

Clinical Research is bullshit!! These so called "investigators" or doctors have their whole staff conduction all the work. They don't properly investigate new drugs. It's all trial and error and more bullshit!

[killtheswitch]

obviously the minds of the supporters are closed.

[carehappens]

the drugs don't save lives but they do kill opportunistic diseases which seems to save lives but then the long term affects of the drugs cause AIDS.

[SirHulk1977]

everyone should take extreme notice to the extreme rage and anger showed by the aid$ supporters at any open debate on aid$ and the "real" cause of aid$ and the treatment protocols for hiv/aid$.the aid$ dissidents,or the more comical name "denialists", cannot even get a word in edgewise at any hiv/aid$ debate.and ironically enough,the only evidence that the aid$ supporters have to support their hiv=aid$ theory is JUST "THEORY" BUT NO PROOF WHATSOEVER!!..but the dissidents has NOTHING BUT PROOF!!!