Top Comments
All Comments (1,307)
-
great sound test thank you. they do have different tones, but its very close... the marshall seemed slightly warmer in the crunch, but i actually liked the clearer crunchiness of the bugera more. great job!
-
@rarebikes88 I have a Bugera 333XL, and when I had it apart to retube it, I found the build quality to be above average, and it has held up perfectly to gigging for over 2 years.
-
@EnveBeats Exactly! :D
-
marshall has more body to it on the clean channel, its pretty obvious actually
the bugera has more of a gritty high end on the overdrive channel
-
Marshall is more warm and clear and not muddy
-
OMG people are so hung up on brand name...if this was a blind test,im sure alot of u marshall fanboys would be confused<<
-
here is the real test! OPen them up and lets see how they are built! I wouldnt play a Bugera if i got one free.
-
There are slight differences but for the price tag Bugera does a great job.
I think i would choose the marshall. At clean i think they sound the same, but at the marshall the distortion sound a bit moore controlled and less dirty than the bugera. If u click 8:33 and 9:27 you will hear the diffrence.
youtubdanix 1 month ago 7
On the clean channel the 1990 has a little more low end,On the crunch channel the 1990 has a little more overdriven tones. I think I may pick up the 1990!
northlander30 4 months ago 6