Killzone 2 E3 05 and E3 07 comparison

I compare the two killzone 2 trailers on 2 sides.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• killzone
• 2
• comparison

[masterking1201]

You see Ps3 Lies

[DeathToFanboys]

*Sony lies

[emretzzon]

Still. Killzone 2 is tstill the best looking PS3 game

[DeathToFanboys]

To me, there's too much depth of field that covers up the bad textures. Also, it was far too grey. No point making a great graphics engine if everything is grey.

[Ingenico]

2005 is obviously better, are you blind?

[merleage2]

to me e3 2005 looks like a movie and e3 2007 looks like a video game. i think the e3 2007 has better graphics for the gun, and i really think that they did an awsome job and basically accomplished their goal as far as graphics

[Choppr777]

you CANT compare a PRE-RENDERED movie to a GAMEPLAY trailer. thats like comparing a final fantasy cutscene to CoD gameplay. its just unfair and clear from second number 1 that the prerendered stuff always looks better

[zardfe]

if this was for pc with dx 11 the graphics will loke better than that trailer

[ThreeDaysOfDan]

@clojap lmfao no its not not even close!!!!

ign oversaid that statement, i have crysis 2 on both consoles * tecnicaly the ps3 on is my friends*

the 360 version has 5 more frames per second but the screen tears a lot, the ps3 version has no screen tear, last i checked screen tear fuckes up the visuals, the lighting is nicer in teh ps3 version 2, any ways crysis 2 on the pc does look better but hell on a console it aint look that good

[chairmobile]

@clojap Lawl when still, even though the other guy (uviar) agreed with what I said, you still don't understand?

I'll use his words:

The sequences are processed by a cpu and an electronic signal is sent through a piece of wire to your television to reproduce the image on screen by emitting light that our eyes can capture and then translate the photons into data which our brains can process and perceive as an image.

Get it? Gameplay, which IS processed by a CPU, IS COMPUTER GENERATED IMAGERY

[clojap]

@chairmobile Because i was trying to have an adult convo with you about the differences between non interactive totally CGI graphics and real time in game graphics, you started with your stupid "it's all CGI" stuff like you've never heard about why they are called different things, then you turned out to be a total wannabe internet tough guy who can say anything because he knows he'll never have to see the person he was speaking to face to face. This is the last time I'll respond to you.

[chairmobile]

@clojap lawl then why did you have trouble with my disrespectful way of addressing you? failtrollisfail

[clojap]

@chairmobile LOL wow I'm so hurt, please someone call 911 I'm about to slit my wrist!! you are a total waste of space, you are nothing but a piece of shit and I was so surprised you started writing about this again after a month away from it I decided to respond only to see why you still cared. You mean nothing to me, I don't care if you respect me or not, I respect you as a human (barely) but other than that KZ2 and KZ3 are not the best looking shooter on a console crysis 2 on the 360 is

[chairmobile]

@clojap Ok, so asking someone if he's a total retard is a respectful way to address them? Are you fucking 6? I'm not going to waste my time acting like I respect someone who doesn't know what CGI stands for but uses it in his tirade on the best looking console shooter's graphics. Why? Because I DON'T respect you.

[chairmobile]

@uviuar If you look at the comment from the other dipshit (clojap) you'll see that he complains that both trailers are "CGI and not real gameplay" and that "the stuff in the game will not look like this 3d CGI". I was pointing out his obvious lack of knowledge. And when you butt into our argument, throw out random shit like "PC is bettar" and then act all confused when I state my ORIGINAL point, which was in the OTHER argument, which had NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU, it's kinda facepalm.jpg