Redshift Periodicity - What does it mean for the Big Bang?

From the 1970s reports of periodicity or quantization in redshifts, especially multiples of 72 km/s have continued to appear. William Tifft, Halton Arp, Geoffrey and Margaret Burbidge and later others who decided to investigate such as Guthrie and Napier. The Big Bang theory cannot explain these observations and so they have been largely ignored. If redshift periodicity is real then redshifts cannot be a true measure of velocity. If the redhsifts do not mean velocity then there is no reason to believe in a big bang.

On larger scales periodicities, known as great walls are also found. These are also very regular.

The variable particle mass theory of Narlikar and the observations that quasars are actually ejected from nearby galaxies along their axes in pairs are consistent. They support a universe that is stable is size and in which galaxies do not move.

Such ideas make the universe vastly ancient compared to the big bang theory, an idea that Fred Hoyle came to through the problem that a few billion years is not long enough to develop complex life.

For more information see:
http://ray.tomes.biz/b2/index.php/a/2007/09/12/p166
http://www.bautforum.com/against-mainstream/63170-quantized-redshift-revisite...

There is also information in Wikipedia, but it does not deal with controversies well, as voting is not a good method for finding truth.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshift_quantization
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_G._Tifft
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halton_Arp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasars%2C_Redshifts_and_Controversies
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intrinsic_redshift
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narlikar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conformal_gravity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-standard_cosmology
(the last couple are rather heavy reading)

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• redshift
• periodicity
• quantization
• red
• blue
• shift
• big
• bang
• bung
• variable
• particle
• mass
• narlikar
• tifft
• arp
• burbidge
• hoyle

[Howie47]

Artynz, do you believe in the expanding Earth theory? I ask because your increasing Galactic energy theory; plus that energy resulting in the forming of new matter in the center of the Earth, would result in an expanding Earth.

[artynz]

I read that the continents fitted better on a smaller earth. I found that GPS data was available showing the 3D movement of sites. I analysed them and found that the earth is indeed expanding slowly. Search google with "ray tomes expanding earth".

[Howie47]

Yes, I've already study it and believe it. Also that the heart of matter is vibrations or waves that repel each other. So the Earth isn't expanding on an uniform time scale. But rather following the pattern you have deduced. Can that be finely tuned enough to predict seismic activity. Has any seismic instruments been planted on any other heavenly bodies? If so, does that activity show correspondence? Are you working on deducing a history of wave activity? I'll visit the sites mentioned.

[artynz]

There are seismic cycles, but they are very difficult to predict because of low probabilities at any time. Earthquakes do tend to repeat at 26 minute intervals. Longer cycles mostly relate to the Moon's orbit.

Yes, Moonquakes are detected by instruments there. The pattern is very simple compared to Earth because there are no tectonic plates.

[amazingindividual]

So is the crux of this theory that all the galaxies are standing still in space and simply gaining in mass as more energy is spewed out from the core? And this extra mass changes its redshift, and its distance to us in space could affect the reading of the redshift. This would create the cute illusion that we are the center of everything hehe. Looking around in the world I seriously doubt we are the center of all creation though. What would be the point lol, apart from a failed experiment

[artynz]

Yes, I think the galaxies are nearly still.

Mass of particles increases at the expense of larger scale wave structures. That particle mass increase makes newer get gradually bluer so that distant objects look redder by comparison.

This makes no difference to the fact that we seem to be at the centre - it always looks like that everywhere.

What experiment?

[consciousGOD]

IN an infinite universe, all places are the center of the universe.

[theevolutionofbilld]

I HIGHLY DOUBT THAT GALAXIES HAVE A SYSTEM I WOULD ASSUME MOST GALAXIES IN CLOSE PROXIMITY AND SIZE DUE TO SIMILAR BEGININGS I ALSO THINK THE COSMOS ARE MUCH LARGER THAN ANYONE THINKS

[theevolutionofbilld]

ID LOVE TO LEARN AND CHAT THEORY/PHILOSOPHY????

[paintingmymasterpiec]

Thanks for posting.

[nickharvey7]

Very interesting vid!

I am on YouTube trying to promote my theory on the dynamics of light and time this is an invitation to see an artist theory on the physics of Time!

Your theory make a lot of sense if the waves form a continuous process of energy exchange, continuous change that we see and feel as the flow of time.

[ryangscott]

Questions.. How can matter form from nothing? I don't get this. Assuming that I haven't seen any satellite images or anything like that. Could I use Entropy and Fractals in some way, to calculate what the universe might look like?

[wavepsychic]

ahh I am having a hard time PICTURING what you are saying bud. Next time can you SHOW us what these Galaxies are doing?

And about the growing Earth. How do we know the Earth is growing instead of decompressing slowly. Maybe when the earth formed it was Electromagnetically compressed?

[mn8n]

@nickharvey7 this might sound like a smart-ass remark, but you already look back in time in all directions because depending on the distance from you - because light takes time to reach your eye & then mind - everything you see, the moment you see it, is actually from the past. Big example - the light from a distant star hits your eye and you're seeing it now... but as it was light years ago. Same applies if you see me right beside you.. it's the past ;)

[55painterman]

if there was such a thing as inflation? and spacetime is exspanding faster than light? why don,t the galaxys just disappare within 50 yrs,? never mind 50 yrs.! 10 minutes!!? if your telescope is pointed on one side of the earth and another on the opposite? why are the galaxys still there? I,ll tell you why ~MORONS!!!!~ and LIERS!!!~we are always lied to"!! from the goverment to the science community!! WTF!!?~soon" I will LOSE MY MIND!!~if you scientist guys don,t know why? then say it!~

[nickharvey7]

Could we all have a special place in the Universe forming our own spacetime geometry relative to our energy or mass? The spheres you take about could be formed by this geometry. We have 4π in the equations of quantum mechanics to support this!