Geocentric Model Reveals Lack of Divine Insight

Here I explain how the notion of the Earth being at the center of the universe underlines the fact that biblical authors did not in fact have divine insight as observed by their writings.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• creationism
• atheism
• debate
• bible
• science
• geocentric
• heliocentric
• christianity
• christian
• fundamentalist
• galileo

[alltiedup217]

@angryspidertv ok really get a dictionary look up the word you don't know what it means .if you did this would be a pointless argument.all you have "he must have done this" or "it must have been this way". why cause you want it to be that way?This is why I think you 'er being willfully ignorant.for the last time ANY INFO YOU GET THAT IS NOT FIRST HAND IS HEARSAY IF HE GOT IT FROM A DOCUMENT AND THAT DOCUMENT IS GONE ..HEARSAY IF WE JUST HAVE HIS WORD HEARSAY you can't be this stupid

[angryspidertv]

@alltiedup217 HAHAHA You're saying I'M the one being willfully ignorant? Macrobius was a writer who flourished in those times, it is highly doubtful he got all of his sources from hearsay. You might even say Macrobius was there to witness the feast of Saturnalia in this aristocrat's home where they were talking about something that had been said (and most likely had been documented in the records) There were many things lost after the fall of Rome, perhaps the record of an obscure event was one.

[angryspidertv]

@alltiedup217 I told you, he must have gotten his information from the royal records or something of that nature. Saturnalia contains an account of the discussions held at the house of Vettius Agorius Praetextatus during the holiday of the Saturnalia. Now Vettius Agorius Praetextatus was a wealthy pagan aristocrat and was a high priest in the cults of many gods. Macrobius was a writer who's works became rather well-known, I find it highly doubtful he got all his sources from hearsay, if not any

[alltiedup217]

@angryspidertv "Hearsay is a statement, other than one made by the declarant...so Marobius saying someone told him that someone told augustus is the very definition of hearsay clearly you don't understand what the word means.

[alltiedup217]

@angryspidertv again you have no idea if Macrobius had any interest in christianity or not you'er just making that up off the top of your head.Lots of people are not christians and still know the stories.

[alltiedup217]

@angryspidertv well unless he was 400 fucking years old it was hearsay.Unless it was told right to his face by a 400 year old roman emp the it was hearsay.Other wise we would have the org source and not need Macrobius at all.why can't you understand this simple point?a witness says "Susan told me Tom was in town" as her evidence to the fact that Tom was in town. Since the witness does not offer in this statement the personal knowledge of the fact, this witness statement would be hearsay GET IT?

[angryspidertv]

@alltiedup217 It is based on the veritable fact that Macrobius was a pagan non-christian who had no interest in Christianity. Why don't you give me evidence that Macrobius got his writings from hearsay instead while addressing the issues I have with his claims being hearsay. Macrobius gives no mention to the Bible, by the way, whereas Darwin does :P

[alltiedup217]

@angryspidertv lastly you can look at a history book see the info within,but what makes it hearsay is if no one else can read the history book you're quoting, and the events you talk about are in question.Or talking about a president from 400 years ago that and saying someone might have told him about something that may or may not have happened.I'm sure you know the difference and you're just again being willfully ignorant.

[alltiedup217]

@angryspidertv baseless you say Macrobius would not know of the story from the bible and you base this on what?you say the source was not hearsay and base it on what?you say he his source wasn't from someone who read the bible based on what?you just make shit up cause you want it to be true.I can't imagine your out cry if science had such little proof for evolution.Darwins book has been talked about by other people it must be true.

[alltiedup217]

@angryspidertv LOL im not a christian and I read the bible dawkins hitchens all read the bible most atheists I know have read the bible that is a silly argument and you know it.history book is one thing its verified why do you think it is that the court won't allow hearsay?is it because people lie have bad memories.BTW it is not a historical fact as I pointed out most if not all historians inc christians think its not an historical event.I do agree it is possible but unlikely.