Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (912)
-
@hopeintruth1 Why was exxon funding an organisation deliberatly trying to spread denialist psuedo-science then?Google heartland institute wiki. Look up funding.
-
@hopeintruth1 There your go. You have a more complete picture now. Google wiki Heartland institute and see the the sction on funding. You will notice Exxon in the list. Then Google Roy Spencer.Skeptial science and you will see Heartland hires him as a consultant. Let me join the dots for you. Exxon funds heartland to spread the nonsense denial campaign, then heartland buys friendly scientists to lie about the urgency of climate change. Simple isn't it?
-
@hopeintruth1 Like to referece that? It's not from the flawed Spencer study is it? You know. The one where the editor of the journal Remote Sensing resigned, because he was so disgusted such a poor study could be published.
-
@hopeintruth1 Polar bears require sea ice to hunt. Arctic sea ice based on current tends will be free of summer ice by mid century. Polar bear numbers have increased due to a hunting ban, however studies on the Hudson bay population show that for every week earlier the ice breaks up, bear live weight drops 10kg.
-
@hopeintruth1 You are talking chalk and cheese. Antarctic winter sea ice has grown, but every summer this almost completely melts. It dosn't effect the Earths energy budget. Arctic ice continues to trend down and the dark ocean left after melting absorbs more heat, that melts more ice. It's a feed back!
-
@hopeintruth1 April ice??? What are you talking about. Data from 20 years ago? Arctic sea ice had it's 4th lowest January extent on record 2012 NSIDC.1.1 Million sq Km below 1979-2012 av
-
part 1
NASA Data Demolishes Global Warming Hoax !
Scientists using NASA data have released another bombshell. To make matters worse, this release was in the peer reviewed scientific journal Remote Sensing. The Alarmists have claimed that the "deniers" lacked credibility because relatively few peer reviewed journals were willing to oppose global warming.
-
part 2
"The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the climate models show. There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans." Translating from polite cautious academic speak to plain English, he is saying the NASA data shows the Global Warming computer models are bunk.
TheHumanity100 2 months ago 8
@TheHumanity100 well temperature is rising due to CO2 and methane gases because they are green house gases. dont tell us to educate ourselves u just copy and pasted earths atmosphere. its not a hoax and look at the temperature increase in the past decade. its not an earth cycle because we are experiencing the 1930's greenhouse gases at the moment (with not too much factory industries at that time). it takes decades for these green house gases to come into play. so stop polluting!
InfectedInHD 1 week ago