Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Arrogant Certainty Of Science - Richard Dawkins @ Pop!Tech (1)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
58,673
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 15, 2009

Science & Reason on Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/ScienceReason

The Arrogant Certainty Of Science - Richard Dawkins @ Pop!Tech (Part 1).

---
Please subscribe to Science & Reason:
http://www.YouTube.com/Best0fScience
http://www.YouTube.com/ScienceMagazine
http://www.YouTube.com/ScienceTV
http://www.YouTube.com/FFreeThinker
---

Richard Dawkins believes sciences ability to admit ignorance is one of its greatest strengths. On the flip side, he proposes that faith remains arrogant and all too certain of its validity without any rational set of proofs.

Richard Dawkins is a British ethologist, evolutionary biologist and popular science author. He was formerly Professor for Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University. He was voted Britain's leading public intellectual by readers of Prospect magazine and was named one of Time Magazine's "100 Most Influential People" for 2007.

Dawkins came to prominence with his 1976 book "The Selfish Gene", which popularised the gene-centred view of evolution and introduced the term "meme". He is a prominent critic of creationism and intelligent design. In his 1986 book "The Blind Watchmaker", he argued against the watchmaker analogy, an argument for the existence of a supernatural creator based upon the complexity of living organisms. Instead, he described evolutionary processes as analogous to a blind watchmaker. He has since written several popular science books, and makes regular television and radio appearances, predominantly discussing these topics.

Dawkins is an atheist, secular humanist, sceptic, scientific rationalist, and supporter of the Brights movement. In his 2006 book "The God Delusion", he contends that a supernatural creator almost certainly does not exist and that faith qualifies as a delusion − as a fixed false belief.

http://www.poptech.org
http://www.richarddawkins.net
http://www.youtube.com/richarddawkinsdotnet
http://www.atheism-magazine.com/people/Richard_Dawkins.html
.

  • likes, 114 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • infectious faith disease

    i was infected too

    Richard Dawkins & Christoper Hitchens healed me.

    If you open your brain you can be free too.

  • The first rule of quantum theory is...you don't talk about quantum theory!!

see all

All Comments (1,618)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @dkthg

    Go for it. I make these up on the fly. I might not even remember this, and someone should get use out of it.

  • @dlenz4437

    > Why are people judgmental and try to discredit people of faith?

    Because the things believed on faith are false, and they inform the actions of believers in harmful and dangerous ways.

    Purpose is not something you derive from the universe, it is something you inflict on it. You don't need faith to decide your purpose, but science can help inform you about your choices.

  • @rkyeun Damn straight. Btw: i'm stealing that comment for myself.

  • @dkthg

    Science is self-correcting.

    Religion is self-corrupting.

  • The key difference between religion and science is that science is open to be challenged, falsified and is SELF-CORRECTING.

  • The Potasium argon clock is NOT reliable in aging fossils found mostly in sedementary rock and not ignious rock. Sedimentary rock allows for contamination of a specemin making it possible for a wide variety of dates. ( Libby who invented the radio carbon clock admitted it also was unrelaible. Dawkins wont tell us any of this, he is too busy and blinded in his hate for relgion.

  • Reason 4 Faith: So our time here on earth has a purpose.

    Reason 4 Science: Acquiring knowledge.

    Why are people judgmental and try to discredit people of faith??? I couldn't tell you but i'm guessing self-gratification. If you study science(no matter what field) do it for the reason of love and not for anything else(humility). We all know there are people who are fanatically religious yet are immoral, contradicting, lacking a backbone, etc., but that is in all walks of life.

  • he is a pretty good speaker

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more