Obama on Redistribution and the Constitution - Are We Ready for Change?
Top Comments
All Comments (26)
-
@jim1flyer I never heard of the “Liberal Constitution,” but I keep hearing about the living-constitution. However, I cannot find a copy of one. I’m afraid I need to purchase a teleprompter to read our living-constitution.
-
@Mike10four : Exactly what the Liberal Constitution would say. The only rights are those granted by the elite, the only law is what the elite decides that day and it's all guaranteed by the living constitution that elites re-write when they feel necessary.
-
If you listen closely in the beginning of this video, it was made in the year 2001.
-
This video was made the night before the 2008 presidential election. The handwriting was on the wall... Mark Levin aka The Great One exposed Obama for the evil doer he is. Too bad 69 million voters drank the kool-aid and delivered this disaster.
-
The Living-constitution preamble: We the Oligarchy of the US, in Order to form a more perfect central government, establish only criminal Justice, insure controlling Tranquility, provide for the common redistribution, promote social Welfare, and secure Liberty only to the Oligarchy and their Posterity, do establish this erratic unpublished constitution for the US.
As for the people, they are on the road to serfdom.
-
obama hates america... i hate obama
-
@Jackgildern, "If we had full-blown Conservatism" We'd have bans on science in schools, controls on every aspect of personal lives, road-blocks in the pursuit of hapiness, etc.
The founding fathers were liberal in the classical sense, but not in the modern, and conservative in that, that's how things used to be, but in today's world they wouldn't fit well with either.
-
You missed it because you had your head stuck up Obamas ass
-
"less government, less tax, less restrictions on business and innovation, increased civil liberties, and a stronger economy." wow... a conservative approach sounds like the perfect world. gosh, how did i completely miss what conservative meant!
The "consequences" of Conservatism at its full is not what you think. For the last couple decades, "Conservatives" in Washington have been so far left, they are practically Liberal.
If we had full-blown Conservatism, there'd be less government, less tax, less restrictions on business and innovation, increased civil liberties, and a stronger economy. Why? Because that's what "Conservative" means... it means being conservative in government, tax, and regulation.
Calm down. Have some dip.
Jackgildern 2 years ago 14
americans just need to wake up. republican or democrat are both just covers for greedy people that will steal from you in one way or another. this is evident in all voting to give themselves raises as our economy tanks and our nations debt doubles. this is disgusting we need to destroy the political party system and remove this government from power replace it with the constitution and write about its true meanings. I'm not sure what flaws he sees in our constitution.
1jsummer 2 years ago 5