Challenge to Gogreen18

A challenge

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• gogreen18
• bible
• venomfangx
• kabane52
• kabanethechristian

[GamingVidsPs3]

George Bush fan and religious? /facepalm

[E34BMW535i]

holy shit! this kid looks like he's eight years old, but sounds like 20! frankly, i was surprised.

[matrixlone]

@killerboyfoolz also chek my playlist

[matrixlone]

@davitodude also chek my playlist

[davitodude]

@killerboyfoolz

It's unfortunate you feel this way.

Farewell and goodluck my friend!

[killerboyfoolz]

@davitodude If there's no contradictions, why on earth are you wasting your time arguing? If you mock science, you can might as well leave. You absolutely have no education about what science is. If you say ou do, then you're not a good student. Get a life. You clearly have no idea what science is.

[davitodude]

@killerboyfoolz

Science does not prove my faith to be false. There are opinions out there that are contrary to mine, but I welcome those challenges, and so far nobody throughout history has disproved the existence of a God.

Dawkins clearly states that he's atheist, not agnostic.

I read a study not long ago that 72% of all U.S. scientists do not believe in God. I wonder though how many of those scientists believe we all evolved from amoebas.

[killerboyfoolz]

@davitodude Richard Dawkins never say lies about science or religion, he only bring out evidences that had been tested or observed.

Why twist his idea just because science just happened to prove your faith wrong.

Richard did say that he is 99% sure there is no God. Remember that "God" for him mean the omnipitant, intervening, loving God. He's okay with God or harmony or a God that doesn't do anything.

Well, I can say 95% of the science field don't accept God.

[davitodude]

@killerboyfoolz

Richard Dawkins isn't making his millions studying the human gnome. Let's be frank here, he's a very wealthy man, and it's primarily because he has an opposing opinion on religion. Don't get me wrong, I think he challenges religion and is asking questions that need to be asked.

As Dawkins argument goes, nobody can prove God to him therefore he does not exist. Yet many people believe it has been proven to them through faith.

Roughly 88% of the world believe in one God.

[killerboyfoolz]

@davitodude Reason why many scientists appreciate Richard Dawkins isn't because he's an atheist, but his explaination on Evolution. I would rather listen to an atheist because they only use science to explain things to a scientist, while a creationist use fallacious reasoning.

If you rather listen about God and what not, that's good. Like I said before, I am a scientist, and I like Richard Dawkins because he's a good evolutionist. To all the science field, he is credible and well-respected.

[davitodude]

@killerboyfoolz

You're correct, it was an interview conducted by a creationist. Would you rather only atheist be allowed to have commentary with Richard Dawkins? Again, I have supplied you with a video of Mr. Dawkins ideas on intelligent design. Now you say it is invalid because a creationist is interviewing him? I am not trying to make a fool of you, I'm only showing you that he's a man and makes errors.

You would do well to start questioning the very thinking you accept.

[killerboyfoolz]

@davitodude I did watch that video. It was created by a creationist. It has a very low credibility. Only sad low-life actually believe in it. If you don't like science, you can just join a cult.