Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

WildTrig29: Trisecting angles and Hadley's theorem

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,614
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 21, 2008

Trisecting angles from a rational trigonometry point of view, featuring a new theorem of Hadley, and relations to the trisectrix.

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @benthurston27 Ok I've got it now a 1,2,1 quadrances triangle is not 3 colinear points, it is a 1,square root of 2,1 in distances or a right triangle. which does make Hadley's theorem say the spreads would be 1/2, 1, 1/2 which is fine. Also the 3rd spread polynomial can be less than the second because sometimes the spread of an angle greater than 90 degrees is less than 1. In this case it would be trisecting the spread of .5 into 3 equal spreads of .5 which is fine.

  • @benthurston27 I see, a 1,2,1 triangle is actually 3 colinear points so the spread's would all be zero which does satisfy the 3 equations.

  • I noticed a 1,2,1 for Q1,Q2,Q3 respectively satisfies Hadley's theorem but doesn't s3 have to be larger than s2?

  • Dear Sir,

    For a simple example of trisection visit

    youtube.com/watch?v=D2D20RIGqm­Y

  • Dear Sir,

    Look into Thomas Hull's book, Project Origami.

    On page 47, he describes a very simple way to trisect any angle <= 90 degrees.

    Moreover he explains why you can trisect with "folding paper geometry."

    Tim Basaldua

  • Is Hadley's theorem the same as the Lost Theorem, described in my video 'Trisecting This" on youtube user LineLItes

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more