Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Christian Radio Host Calls Back: Proof Of God - TAG Debate Matt Slick & Matt Dillahunty (3)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
30,427
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 23, 2009

Science & Reason on Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/ScienceReason

Christian Radio Host Calls Back: Proof Of God - TAG Debate Between Matt Slick & Matt Dillahunty (3/5): Arguing about the existence of God (The Atheist Experience #593 with Matt Dillahunty and Tracie Harris).

---
Please subscribe to Science & Reason:
http://www.youtube.com/Best0fScience
http://www.youtube.com/ScienceMagazine
http://www.youtube.com/ScienceTV
http://www.youtube.com/FFreeThinker
---

Link to last week's show (Matt Slick's first call): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ot5DMSMYRWI

Matt Slick's Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God: http://www.carm.org/secular-movements/atheism/transcendental-argument-existen...

---

Matthew J. Slick is the creator and webmaster of the Christian website "Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry" (http://www.carm.org ), and is the host of a related radio program in Boise, Idaho entitled "Faith and Reason". Slick is a Protestant presuppositional apologist and a leader in the counter-cult movement. He considers it his mission to "answer opposition to the Christian faith," which in his view includes all non-Christian worldviews and non-Protestant denominations of Christianity, including Catholicism (though he believes many individual Catholics are saved) and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

What is The Atheist Experience?

The Atheist Experience is a weekly cable access television show in Austin, Texas, geared at an atheist and non-atheist audience. The Atheist Experience is produced by the Atheist Community of Austin (ACA), a nonprofit educational corporation to develop and support the atheist community, to provide opportunities for socializing and friendship, to promote secular viewpoints, to encourage positive atheist culture, to defend the first amendment principle of state-church separation, to oppose discrimination against atheists and to work with other organizations in pursuit of common goals.

http://Atheist-Experience.com
http://Atheist-Community.org
http://ustream.tv/channel/The-Atheist-Experience
http://AtheistExperience.blogspot.com
http://NonProphetsRadio.com
http://Atheist-Community.org/donate/
Wiki: http://IronChariots.org
Fan club: http://facebook.com/group.php?gid=20603369467&ref=ts
Cartoons: http://Atheist-Community.org/atheisteve/
Email: tv@atheist-community.org
.

  • likes, 93 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • I´m really impressed with Matt´s command of logic, the radio guy hasn´t the first clue

  • this is the very simple and basic argument of "If a tree falls but no ones around to hear it, does it make a sound" the obvious answer is yes, it still makes a sound. This idiot is trying to say it wouldn't make a sound.

see all

All Comments (913)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Matt Dillahunty just proved he has a far greater grasp of philosophy than Matt Slick.

  • @knowone11111 Spider-man just is. Superman just is... and you know what, they're more moral than God. You don't know what a logical fallacy is.

  • @ParasiteS27 The question though, is how do you define 'sound'; the conceptualization of 'sound' is contingent upon a recipient/interpreter; and in that case the tree does not make a 'sound', because the concept of 'sound' requires an entity to 'hear' it. If you define sound as vibrations passing through a medium, as I would, then of course the tree makes the sound. This is the briar patch that Matt Slick has fallen into.

  • matts on top of his shit man. and im not talkin matt slick

  • The logical absolutes aren't conceptual. They are a state of reality, our concepts of which are conceptual.

    In the same way that if we can conceive of an apple, then the apple isn't conceptual, our CONCEPT of the apple is.

    God, this debate gives me a headache.

  • If I write a note on a piece of paper, and all minds cease to exist, does that note cease to have writing?

    To put it another way, Slick is claiming that because "noise" is subjective, so is "sound".

  • This is why I'm not a philosophy major anymore.

  • @ParasiteS27 He is making the True, yet erroneous argument that Sound is contingent upon someone to Hear it. The physics which dictate what happens when a tree falls still exists, but the Concept of sound would not. If one wishes to term preassure waves as sound, then, of course, the tree has made a sound, but if one terms it as requiring someone to hear it, then no sound was made.

  • Dillahunty says that things, "don't exist". that's a logical fallacy. EVERYTHING exists whether we know it or not. if it didn't, there wouldn't be existence. God just IS and we finite creatures have a problem with this.

  • Wow this was the worst episode of A.E ever!

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more