The Age of the Earth Debate
Top Comments
All Comments (55)
-
@dapletd It is based on the assumption that we can look at the world around us and conclude things from it.
Example: If a world wide flood deposited all sediments, then we wouldn't find halite in multiple layers. Easy. That Noah story is debunked.
-
@dapletd YECs think the earth is 6000 years old and most creatards think we came off a boat 4400 years ago. Tree rings prove them both wrong.
-
@asinine81 Read Exodus7 "Aaron's Walking Stick" for the funniest thing ever and it leaves Harry Potter for dead! Young earth creationists would actually believe it is fact!
-
You guys are really claiming that we were still created by a bronze age god? This is ridiculous...
-
@dixiebobber I wouldn't call a Ph. D Astrophysicist stupid....
-
are these guys insane?
-
The best estimate for the age of Earth is 4.54 billion years +/- 1%
I'm not aware of a "debate" regarding the age of Earth, but 6000 year estimate is a big error.
-
@Duiliath The Bible says that NOWHERE.
-
@Venaloid Kent is the worst when show evidence and then makes up stories to support the bibble, with no evidence.
-
@gregrutz - Kent Hovind was confronted with this by Eugenie Scott and he said that "Oh, well you know, trees get false rings, maybe one didn't get as much water as another" - It's called science because repeatable with large sample sizes, der.
The bible is not the only thing God gave us to read. He also gave us another sort of scripture. That is what is written in stone, and the stars, and all living things. This scripture (the world itself) spells out, very clearly, that the earth is billions of years old.
Siddis33 2 years ago 13
Tree rings go back 11,300 years,
so much for a young earth argument.
gregrutz 2 years ago 12