Moon Dehoax: Sibrelies VII Part One ( A Transparent Tampering - more detailed version )

Analysis of moon hoax evidences: side by side comparison of Bart Sibrel's post-debunk, second version of his moon hoax theory, now based in an allegedly transparency hanging from CM's window #1, with the original footages from the Apollo 11 mission and broadcasted shots from ABC.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• first
• moon
• landing
• 1969
• neil
• armstrong
• buzz
• aldrin
• apollo
• 11
• space
• earth
• travel
• 1st
• step
• on
• the
• fake
• radio
• ufos
• ed
• von
• renouard
• neil armstrong
• ufo
• thebadastronomer
• hoax
• flying
• wires

[philwebb59]

At 7:05, the top picture goes from being Sibrel's video to the ABC News coverage. The bottom is a much clearer archive video? So you're showing that Sibrel's "never before seen" video is simply an excerpt from a longer, publicly available video which was viewed by the world on TV back in 1969? Funny that Sibrel didn't remember seeing this on TV when he was 14 years old, seeing as how he was such an Apollo fan at the time.

[jcgmed]

@philwebb59 That's right, Phil.

I've had to split this chapter in 3 parts, in order for comparing the long original footage with Sibrel's and ABC's..

[jcgmed]

@philwebb59

You might try watching the second part, which is the most interesting of all, at least for me: what Sibrel assumes as a backstage trickery, was being aired at that moment by ABC.

The bottom looks almost equal if compared with as it was used by Sibrel in his 1st documentary, seems that the one from ABC was captured but no subsequent optimizations were done.

Thanks for watching, Cheers.

[delahaye100]

What I don't get with this Sibrel stuff is that the MATCHING Hasselblad stills are available and are obviously not faked and the cloud patterns etc are obviously the same, these cloud patterns match the existing weather at the time so it is cannot be a preshot earth picture stuck on the window..ah well..

[jcgmed]

@delahaye100 Hi delahaye100, check this out please: 7:58.

No matter what this object can be or not, its contours looks blurry because the camera is focusing something which is located very far away from it, this is, Earth itself.

Cheers.

[Astrobrant2]

Juan, sometimes I get a little confused as to just what point you're making. You cleared it up somewhat in this video.

One thing, though. Would you consider putting an annotation on this, indicating that the *other* scrolling text is HIS, not yours. It's obvious to people who know you, but maybe not to others. This could cause considerable confusion.

[jcgmed]

@Astrobrant2 Gosh the next will be the third time for this one..." Moon Landing Hoax What You Never Saw On TV " is a lot more unknown of what I've thought.

[tenthousandyearsgoon]

WOw the copy you have is much better than the one aired on TV, it must indeed be the original. LOL

[tenthousandyearsgoon]

Good work Bro expose the truth!  We know the truth yes we do...

[tenthousandyearsgoon]

what the hell is that crappy sound effect bs in the background? 2:30