Newest Quad Core AMD Revealed for First Time
Top Comments
All Comments (1,107)
-
my pc's better and that one looks like shit
-
intel ruls u AMD idiots
-
I was waiting for a bluescreen xD
-
@AquaInertia Don't be so sure....
-
TOO LOUD!!!!
-
....and just 4 years later a shitty $500 PC owns this
-
My cock has five cores and runs like a turbo diesel dodge ram motor
-
Wow that's really good
-
thats the point! if you setup a PC like thisone in the video, you dont buy only 4GB - if you realy want to WORK (not play) with you PC you need a lot of power to work with your apps the best way. so i need the 16GBram if i want to rampreview a huge animationscene for example, its also a question of time, how many time you got for your work/project. the most people dont need a PC, a netbook would do the same for their interests, i need a pc to work with not to do usual stuff
-
@dafinga666 I'm talking about 4GB PCs not 1GB ones. Also yes - those things you named do need more RAM than usual. But do note that even then 8GB is usually enough to do so. Even when rendering you'll rarely reach 8GB, let alone 16GB. (obviously that's depending on the scene you're rendering - resolution, how many models in the scene and so on.). 16GB currently is a HUGE overkill.
old technology? so amd integrating the memory controller and making a monolithic quad core years before intel was just amd using "old technology". both intel and amd trade blows at whose the fastest or whose the most efficient. saying amd uses old technology is misleading, both amd and intel use 45nm transistors, and amd uses liquid assisted refraction in their fabs, something intel had to wait on until 32nm later in 2010.
thebeetalls 2 years ago 14
uh dude enthusist not gaming its to hold HD movies
alexjustalex1 2 years ago 9