Uploaded by MyEarbot on Aug 23, 2007
The International Atomic Energy Agency's next progress report on Iran's disputed nuclear program could very well determine whether the U.N. Security Council imposes a third set of sanctions against Tehran. The IAEA report is expected in early September. But in Washington a debate is raging now over whether diplomacy has run its course and if bolder action is needed to block Iran's nuclear and regional ambitions.
IAEA officials met in Tehran in an effort to resolve issues surrounding Iran's uranium enrichment program. Iran has ignored U.N. demands to stop the program, insisting it is geared only to produce electricity. The United States and other western countries strongly suspect Tehran wants to build nuclear weapons.
The IAEA's conclusions on whether Iran is being more transparent may determine support for U.S. efforts to impose additional sanctions on Iran.
IAEA officials met in Tehran in an effort to resolve issues surrounding Iran's uranium enrichment program. Iran has ignored U.N. demands to stop the program, insisting it is geared only to produce electricity. The United States and other western countries strongly suspect Tehran wants to build nuclear weapons.
The IAEA's conclusions on whether Iran is being more transparent may determine support for U.S. efforts to impose additional sanctions on Iran.
But some say even this will not be enough to stop Iran's nuclear ambitions -- and a debate is underway at various Washington think tanks over whether stronger action, including the use of force, is needed to deter Iran.
The hawks point out that despite U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's offer more than a year ago to talk to Iran, little progress has been made on the nuclear issue or in stopping Iran's Revolutionary Guards from supplying weapons to Iraqi insurgents. The former U.S. ambassador to the U.N., John Bolton, is among those advocating a much tougher stance.
For now, imposing tougher U.N. sanctions on Iran appears to be the Bush administration's priority. In March, the Security Council voted to freeze the overseas assets of certain individuals and organizations involved in Iran's nuclear program.
State Department spokesman Sean McCormack says the administration continues to view such measures as a valuable tool. "They have the force of international law. And more and more, you have seen a cloud gathering over Iran and its dealings with the international financial community and the international business community."
But Iranian leaders may decide they have nothing to lose by waiting out the remaining 17 months of the Bush administration -- a move John Calabrese believes could be risky. "The administration's own time in office and its own difficulties politically may send a signal to the Iranians that they can stall, and they can buy time, and they can just wait us out. And the wild card here is the degree of patience or sense of urgency that the administration has, or doesn't have, and the point at which they may feel compelled to take more coercive steps."
And the Bush administration has made clear it will not "tolerate" a nuclear armed Iran.
-
2 likes, 0 dislikes
Link to this comment:
10:10Iran and North Koreaby BiggsReport1,411 views
0:22FREEZE THE THREAT OF WAR ON IRAN!by baysidefriend818 views
7:58Iran's Nuclear Showdown and Israelby rageunderground25,785 views
3:35CNN: Iran Nuclear Dispute- 7 Feb 2010by PNINT1,282 views
7:55Ahmadinejad Challenges Obama into War, Death to...by 16Azar20093,130 views
2:44China's Involvement in Iran Nuclear Crisisby NTDTVIL5,763 views
9:11Tulane Advanced Finance Strategy: Investmentsby TulaneUOnline763 views
2:44Tony Benn on Iranian Historyby wotdoesitmatter15,508 views
1:45US report plays down Iran threat (should the u....by shazad4183,176 views
10:09IRAN-PAK-INDIA PIPELINE- VOA TV -FAROOQ HASNAT ...by hasnatf11,588 views
5:45Nuclear Showdownby zhijun0711894 views
4:30Baghdad Conference: A Final Showdown Between th...by linkmedia1,529 views
7:589/11 - Condoleezza Rice at the 911 commisionby guaii15,246 views
2:52International Executive MBA onlineby qstopexecedezine2,014 views
9:58An illegal interview with Mordechai Vanunu - Pa...by clacclo23,515 views
9:57Ron Paul - An idea whose time has comeby eblair0317,592 views
6:48Don't Body Yourselfby antarez77744,551 views
8:28NAWAZ SHARIF MANHANDLED BY MUSHARRAF -FAROOQ H...by hasnatf140,496 views
9:44Notorious BIG Life After Death DVD part 5by bts17879,308 views
1:01Kermit Cintron trains with Emanuel Stewardby mightyglovesdotcom32,857 views
- Loading more suggestions...
USA has targets all over the world. why is USA allowed to have nuclear weapons and no one else?? its like being in a room with 100 people and only one person has a gun...if he finds out someone else has the same weapon, they will fight..this was like the cold war stand-off between america and russia..as soon as america realised russia had nukes the world had to take sides..
gbilios 2 years ago
and tell me what the USA is doing with ITS nuclear weapons program?? the USA is the only nation with the BIGGEST nuclear arsenal in the world..and the USA is the only nation to have used a nuclear weapon against another nation..
gbilios 2 years ago
USA is the only nation to have used a nuclear weapon against another nation..no other nation has used nuclear weapons in a war..
gbilios 2 years ago
Once Again Ignorant comments Bye Ignorant People Who Do Nothing But Curse People And Just Nuke A Country
the United States Of America Could Blast Any Country Of The Face Of The Earth,Iran Doesnt Even Come Close
The United States Has 15,000 Nuclear Weapons
Iran Has None!!!!
The Elite OF America Want To Rule The World With No Regard to Human Life,Not The American People But The People On Top
newyorkcitymayor 3 years ago
we need to nuke these vile muslims
caltontongs73 3 years ago
Iran needs to be blasted. They're building weapons.
Fun4Sly 3 years ago
turkiye please bring peace in this region beause america europe and russia are always trying to kill humans by supporting terror-organisations
turkishmuscles 3 years ago