Twin Tower Fires Not Hot Enough to Melt or Weaken Steel! Fire Could Not Have Brought Down Towers!

Frank A. Demartini, on-site construction manager for the World Trade Center, spoke of the resilience of the towers in an interview recorded on January 25, 2001. The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door -- this intense grid -- and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting.

Professor James Fetzer states that 9/11 was the first and only time in history that any steel structure had collapsed due to fire. It had never been recorded in the history of structural engineering before 9/11 or since. The Government wants us to believe that on 9/11 the laws of physics were suspended. Fires in the buildings did not burn hot enough to melt or weaken steel.

MIT Engineer Jeff King says that even FEMA admits that the kerosene fuel would have burnt off very quickly. Most of the fuel would have disappeared in the huge fireball. The fires that were burning in the Towers were only from office contents. The black smoke pouring out of the buildings prove a cool, oxygen-starved fire.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• nano-thermite
• thermite
• 9/11
• 9/11 fake
• 9/11 fraud
• 9/11 exposed
• 9/11 truth
• September 11
• 2001
• conspiracy
• building 7
• World Trade Center
• eyewitness
• NYC
• WTC
• inside job
• controlled demolition
• explosions
• Flight 11
• Flight 77
• Flight 93
• Flight 175
• bombs
• twin towers
• Verichip
• Laser targeting
• military technology
• New World Order
• freefall speed
• white plane
• NORAD drills
• molten metal
• North Tower
• South Tower

[roquefortfiles]

Multiple jet impacts?? Yeah don't think so dude!!! (Mr Project Manager!!). It was designed to take the impact of a 707. Slow on landing approach with a greatly reduced fuel load. It was NOT designed to take the impact of a jet hitting it at full throttle with a full fuel tank. Once failure occurs there is NOTHING stopping 31 floors going through the rest of the building.

[GeneralRonnie98]

the twin towers were made of plaster,sheet rock,and granite floors...get your facts right

[PostalCode74]

1. A 707 is smaller than a 767. It also didnt account for fires.

2. The FEMA report does not say that the fuel was burned off in the initial explosion. Only 30% was. Most of the remaoning burned off in 10 min, causing massive office fires that burned till the collapse

3. The steel did not melt, and none of the reports say that. They only needed to weaken it. Steel loses 50% of it's strength at 1100F. The fires burned at 1800F.

[want2bealone]

@Neylonx To have something cut a pieces of steel at the rate of the 911 crash, it would have been Thermite. And there was proof that the parking levels had large quantities of Thermite burning weaks after 911!

[Neylonx]

buy guys, you're forgetting the chemicals that the planes were probably carrying for their chemtrails. who knows how hot that burns.

[MrEmerye]

@Gtfoguy1 I don't believe they were designed to fall. They were what was called an "white elephant". The style was outdated, the lower floors contained asbestos,many other expensive renovations were needed. Why would Silverstein invest in something that was in need of such costly attention. This man is not a ignorant investor. He would of gone in the red if the structures were not hit. I want the truth to come out to main stream, but I worry that it may destroy this country if it did also.

[Gtfoguy1]

Anyone ever hear that the 32nd floor of both of these towers were completely empty, and that there were huge shafts going down the sides of these towers? Perfect place to hide dynamite, thermite, and God knows what else that could explode in these towers. It's simple. These towers were created to fall. These towers were created for 9/11 to happen.

[MsVlogable]

seems very odd. came down like buildings I have seen filled with explosives. This building was not that well guarded in garage area. it was an easy target.

[jackstraw93]

40 mph winds, say the supporters of the official story. Why didn't anyone challenge them on that? Official Weather Service records from the day show the wind was 9-10 mph. Do you see any raging wind-whipped fires in the videos?

[ExpIice]

there were bombs planted at the bottom of the buildings