Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Newt Presents Energy Solutions--Democrat Responds: Where's The Newt Who's On Our Side?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
2,384
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The man knows his shit, why isn't he in charge of the US domestic industrial policy?

  • lots of money needs to research in fusion energy

  • What is wrong with Hot Fusion , we can obtain that with Plasmification ,

    We can do it with the old Plasma Laser tech , the new generation of Plasma .

    Oh it is not easy to get new Science out .

    See James Tracy Pure Power inc

  • both parties have failed us fire them all and run the bums out of town

  • when did i say it would or wouldn't be subsidized? Your tangential comment are just seeking to change the subject.

  • Newt touches on many important points. He makes sense about the different types of energy. I read many comments and people are just to dishonest to tell the truth. He focuses on many different types of energy, why do some try to only argue on point? France, Japan also use Nuclear energy, so why not include them in the conversation? Jackasses are those that don't face the truth.

  • re: goony11

    Actually the irony of his approach is "SUBSIDIZE THE HELL OUT OF NUCLEAR AND COAL"

    I wish Solarthermal or Geothermal got as much subsidies and financing and Coal/Nuclear already do.

    greyfalcon. net/ subs.png

    greyfalcon. net/ nuclear

    But as for China/India he's leaving out that both these countries have a lot of desert, a lot of sand, and expansive electricity grids.

    greyfalcon. net/ solarthermal2

    greyfalcon. net/ 92x92

    greyfalcon. net/ solarbaseload

  • re: asianlikerice

    ==That aside, I think supporting energy industry that rely on exterior resources is a bad idea. If oil isn't the problem then the next source of energy such as gas, nuclear fuel will be.==

    What makes you think Nuclear, Coal, and Oil aren't subsidized?

    Coal gets 3 billion dollars a year in subsidies, Nuclear 1.2 billion, with expected 100% taxpayer capital financing.

    Oil? Just consider the military spending needed. It's in the trillions.

  • this guy is basically saying china doesn't give a shit about the environment so why should we? oh yeah sudan doesn't care about human rights, why should we? jackass

  • What in the hell is Inslee talking about. He must have been listening to a different testimony.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more