Newt touches on many important points. He makes sense about the different types of energy. I read many comments and people are just to dishonest to tell the truth. He focuses on many different types of energy, why do some try to only argue on point? France, Japan also use Nuclear energy, so why not include them in the conversation? Jackasses are those that don't face the truth.
==That aside, I think supporting energy industry that rely on exterior resources is a bad idea. If oil isn't the problem then the next source of energy such as gas, nuclear fuel will be.==
What makes you think Nuclear, Coal, and Oil aren't subsidized?
Coal gets 3 billion dollars a year in subsidies, Nuclear 1.2 billion, with expected 100% taxpayer capital financing.
Oil? Just consider the military spending needed. It's in the trillions.
this guy is basically saying china doesn't give a shit about the environment so why should we? oh yeah sudan doesn't care about human rights, why should we? jackass
The man knows his shit, why isn't he in charge of the US domestic industrial policy?
Endostatic 4 months ago in playlist More videos from joegerarden
lots of money needs to research in fusion energy
arcannar 2 years ago
What is wrong with Hot Fusion , we can obtain that with Plasmification ,
We can do it with the old Plasma Laser tech , the new generation of Plasma .
Oh it is not easy to get new Science out .
See James Tracy Pure Power inc
sadhouse 2 years ago
both parties have failed us fire them all and run the bums out of town
NHMntnHIGH 2 years ago
when did i say it would or wouldn't be subsidized? Your tangential comment are just seeking to change the subject.
asianlikerice 2 years ago
Newt touches on many important points. He makes sense about the different types of energy. I read many comments and people are just to dishonest to tell the truth. He focuses on many different types of energy, why do some try to only argue on point? France, Japan also use Nuclear energy, so why not include them in the conversation? Jackasses are those that don't face the truth.
jsibauste 2 years ago 2
re: goony11
Actually the irony of his approach is "SUBSIDIZE THE HELL OUT OF NUCLEAR AND COAL"
I wish Solarthermal or Geothermal got as much subsidies and financing and Coal/Nuclear already do.
greyfalcon. net/ subs.png
greyfalcon. net/ nuclear
But as for China/India he's leaving out that both these countries have a lot of desert, a lot of sand, and expansive electricity grids.
greyfalcon. net/ solarthermal2
greyfalcon. net/ 92x92
greyfalcon. net/ solarbaseload
greyflcn 2 years ago
re: asianlikerice
==That aside, I think supporting energy industry that rely on exterior resources is a bad idea. If oil isn't the problem then the next source of energy such as gas, nuclear fuel will be.==
What makes you think Nuclear, Coal, and Oil aren't subsidized?
Coal gets 3 billion dollars a year in subsidies, Nuclear 1.2 billion, with expected 100% taxpayer capital financing.
Oil? Just consider the military spending needed. It's in the trillions.
greyflcn 2 years ago
this guy is basically saying china doesn't give a shit about the environment so why should we? oh yeah sudan doesn't care about human rights, why should we? jackass
goony11 2 years ago
What in the hell is Inslee talking about. He must have been listening to a different testimony.
gsuitter 2 years ago