Russian junk "warship" on fire in the Pacific ocean

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
19,803
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 18, 2008

Sep 18 - A fire on a Russian warship in the Pacific kills two sailors and about 15 million Russian Ruble damage caused, the latest in a series of accidents that have raised doubts about the safety of Russia's fleet.

The fire occurred on the large anti-submarine ship the Marshal Shaposhnikov ( http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9C%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%88%D0%B0%D0%BB_%D0%A8%D0%B...) ).

Navy officials said they suspected the fire broke out in the engine room when an oil pipe ruptured during a naval exercise in the Sea of Japan.

  • likes, 46 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (25)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @PlayF00tball Well said. Russia is just wasting more steel.

  • Please Russia, don't insult us again and name the next so called "warship" of yours "Tbilisi as you did with the Kutznezov. It's severely damaging the image of our capital.

  • We have better sea worthy ships sitting in out moth ball and resveve fleets. The Russian navy is a joke.

  • @Legacyleg3nd Really? Thats something they never talked about. They made it seem that the carriers were impervious to attack. Any way I could get some more info on that?

  • @PlayF00tball Aircraft Carriers project incredible air power over a wide area. It is foolish to say they are useless. If the US wanted to, it could raze Gadhafi's Libya with the combined air power of just a handful of carriers. You can't get within 200 miles of a carrier group without being dead or authorized.

  • @PlayF00tball No I have to disagree with you that aircraft carriers are useless, because they bring alot more to the fight including extending time on target! And you can park them off any coast if the US planes would have to do air refuels from bases it also extends the time the crews are in the air! US tried that concept when reagan attacked Libya back in the 80's using f-111's from UK the flight was extended by 12 hours. Besides the United States does not have 180 over seas bases.

  • Wow that guy must be in charge, look at the size of that hat!

  • @PlayF00tball

    True.

  • hahahahahaha....RUSSIA SUCKs......POOR Bastards

  • This isn't 1942. Russia's been selling their carriers to anyone stupid & wasteful enough to buy them. Aircraft carriers are absolutely useless, pure psychological warfare. They are the most vulnerable targets in war, unless you're fighting Lebanon but guess what, modern jets can fly long distance, but they don't even need to do that with all the bases the US has in (180?) countries. That junk is doing nothing but contributing to plastic oceans and the military-industrial complex.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more