David Chandler AE911TRUTH gives presentation in Visalia, 17.12.2009, Teil 1/7

I've worked up a bunch of new material for my talk...not your typical powerpoint lecture...some of the material not produced into videos yet. I'm talking here to my home team, the Visalia Friends Meeting (a socially liberal, activist bunch, generally), and other hangers-on, who are supportive of me personally, but some may not know much about what I'm doing or necessarily have much background or firm opinions on 9/11. Because of that this will be a more personal introduction to 9/11 research: things anyone can see, and anyone with some minimal background in physics can measure. I would like to introduce those of you from AE911Truth who will be coming into town for this and I will open it up for all commers in the Q & A. John said he will be video taping the event.

If you aren't familiar with Quakers, or have the wrong impression that we're like the Amish or something else quaint, see http://quaker.org/visalia/subpages/WhoAreTheQuakers.html

--David Chandler


http://ae911truth.org
source (thx): http://johnp.blip.tv/file/3027090/

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• 9/11
• Blueprint
• for
• Truth
• The
• Architecture
• of
• Destruction
• Richard
• Gage
• 2008
• Research
• Edition
• ae911truth
• deutsch
• german
• inside
• job
• Alex
• Jones
• Bush
• 911
• wtc
• wtc7
• wtc1
• wtc2
• thermit
• thermat
• 11.september
• unter
• falscher
• flagge
• infokrieg
• infowars
• companion
• edition
• 10
• 30
• 60
• Nist
• AIA
• David
• Chandler
• gives
• presentation
• in
• Visalia
• friends
• Quakers
• Quaker

[LHOdidntdoit]

@MrIHADANACCOUNT One more thing, 7 was it multiple times by a 1360 ft tall tower ripping it 100 new assholes. See voluminous FDNY attesting to that. See wtc7liesgooglepages, they have a spread sheet for same.

Planes are not the only thing that cause fatal load altering damage.

As I was clearly referring to the Towers when I cited your lack of mentioning the planes, not 7 shit wit!

[LHOdidntdoit]

@MrIHADANACCOUNT NIST put out an entire report on 7, guess you missed it.

Apparently youre unaware of the MIT and Northwestern Univ pieces on the Towers.

Your ignorance is not my problem.

By the way I insult EVERYONE who actually buys the CD BS.

Know why?

Youre utterly DUMB, thats why.

Also I embrace logic, logic that dictates that rigging these bldgs w/o detection was impossible.

Also there was simply no NEED to rig the bldgs. No theory, just FACT.

But logic escapes Truthers COMPLETELY.

[LHOdidntdoit]

@MrIHADANACCOUNT See the very thorough papers by MIT and Northwestern Univ.

Read just the synopsizes upfront, its all in there.

Added to which, the way you couch what brought the towers down is utterly ignorant.

Not even mentioning the planes and the fatal load altering damage they caused form their extremely violent impacts.

SO Typical of the mighty Truther!

Fuck off nitwit!

[MrIHADANACCOUNT]

@LHOdidntdoit Apply the "science" of the "official" account.

ALL three of the WTCs were NOT controlled demolitions according to NIST then it must already make sense to you and other such engineers within controlled demolition companies to consider cost cutting measures, correct?

No more weeks and weeks of planning setting charges. They can use inexpensive jet fuel and add office refuse from a landfill to avoid costly high explosives.

Start saving some big money on demolitions!

Right?

[MrIHADANACCOUNT]

Let's pursue and apply the "science" of the "official" account.

Since all three of the WTCs were not controlled demolitions according to NIST then it must already make sense for engineers within controlled demolition companies to consider cost cutting measures, correct?

No more weeks and weeks of planning setting charges. They can use inexpensive jet fuel and add office refuse from a landfill to avoid costly high explosives.

There - let's start saving some big tax money for demolitions!

[Daddyo930]

You mean that a lowly high school physics teacher had the courage to actually tell the truth? Strange that NIST can't prove this guy wrong. NIST will not submit it's reports and data for peer review therefore anything they say can't be trusted. 911 was an inside job and if NIST would submit it's reports and data for peer review it will be proven beyond all scientific doubt.

[LHOdidntdoit]

@Daddyo930 Science and reason have ALREADY prevailed and dictate collapse vs CD. As there was and is NO CD behavior that gets the bldgs to move AT ALL.

NO SEISMIC data to back up CD either, NONE!

NO ONE has shown it! NO ONE, including D chandler!

YOu and DOPES like you dont get it.

And you NEVER will!

Proof positive that science and reason have already won!!

LMFAO at YOU!

[Daddyo930]

Never give up. Science and reason will prevail. Faith in the laws of physics are the only thing that will save us from lies and deception. If the building "fell" down, most of it should have been intact. Mr. Chandler's explanation is damning straight forward physics which is what he teaches in high school that something is wrong with the government's explanation of how buildings 1, 2 and 7 fell.

[flanksteak2]

He has a beard! He must know what he's talking about. LOL

[henningvontreskow]

Thank you for being an educated and a courageous person, an rare combination. See " youtube "WTC North Tower Exploding".