Michael Badnarik's Constitution Class 2 of 43

In the early eighties Michael Badnarik started his career as a computer programmer at an Illinois nuclear power plant. For the past twenty years he has continued this professional course, but during this time he became interested and frustrated with politics. As a result, in 1983 Badnarik began studying the IRS and then the constitution. He had since condensed his 18 years of research into a short eight hour course that he would teach in a lecture format. It included some of the fundamentals on our rights and the foundations of our republic. A video recording of one of the classes has been made and you can watch it here..

Category:

Education

Tags:

• constitution
• Sovereignty
• law
• freedom
• bill
• of
• rights
• police
• land

[nilesmc]

the 'My body is my property concept' will be tested soon with the attempted forced vaccinations because of the fake H1N1 Swine Flu Pandemic.

If you HAVE to take a vaccine then you don't own your own body, do you?

[mzettley]

This concept was already tested with the War on Drugs so the government has already taken this away when the y arrest someone for having an illegal drug.

[1we7the8people6]

Thank you Michael Badnarik's I'm from Texas and I love seeing that were on the right TRACK headed the right way with sharing this Information

[hitshiftrotate]

@gintherlover I should have been more specific. I meant the interpersonal division kind. Thanks for your response though.

[gintherlover]

@hitshiftrotate Oh, also, one more thing. I believe the world should never have a central government that governs us all. We should be and remain independent sovereign peoples that do not join in any pacts or alliances except in times of international war and only as permitted by international common law. There needs to be a central world government that has NO JURISDICTION over individuals but only over the intercourse of nations.And it should be modeled after the U.S. federal const.

[gintherlover]

@hitshiftrotate I will propound this one belief I have about our nation. And that is that regardless of what religion you practice, or what your lifestyle choices are, or what constitutionally secured rights you choose to exercise this week, our legal and political system is of English origin, and passed down to our republic and modified and altered to fit the mold of our republican system and supreme law, the constitution. If anyone has a problem with that, tough shit.

[gintherlover]

@hitshiftrotate I think this country is interesting because it is such a melting pot. But we must learn to live together as ONE PEOPLE, or better yet, a UNION OF PEOPLES. or we are doomed.

[gintherlover]

@hitshiftrotate To get to your question more directly: I think some division is great. Like having smaller states that are part of a union. This sort of division is more of an administrative strategem aimed at better and more localized government balanced with central government. However, interpersonal divisions are detrimental. Racism, hatreds, prejudices, ethnocentrism, etc. ALL BAD. Muslim v. Christian, BAD. Itailians v. Irish, BAD, and so on.

[gintherlover]

@hitshiftrotate ...3.) To be able to attack smaller numbers of enemy at any one time. If you have 100 men; it is easier to conquer 10 groups of 10, one group at a time, rather than taking on the whole schmagilla all at once.

[gintherlover]

@hitshiftrotate Hi there. Your question is general. And as a general concept, division is key to conquest. So saith Sun Tzu and Napoleon Bonaparte. Whether originated from within the group, or introduced by a would-be conqueror of the group, the conqueror uses division to accomplish some very ideal ends: 1.) To fracture the enemy into smaller, weaker groups; 2.) To increase the possibility that in-fighting among the smaller groups will drain some of the enemies' resources, weakening them;

[hitshiftrotate]

@gintherlover What about the creation of division? I think division is the biggest obstacle we face right now as a nation. What do you think?

[zilla2033]

@bneyens Actually.....that's a really good example. Kind of an unrealistic one, but still, very good point!