Dr Steven Jones: time to out fox Fox
Uploader Comments (seandulac)
Top Comments
-
Tucker: do you have any evidence of these claims?
Jones: well there's the video clip I sent you.
Tucker: we don't have time for that, instead I'm going to ask you the same questions over and over again.
-
What an asshole Tucker Carlson is!!! Total asshole!
All Comments (54)
-
it,s funny how the main stream media can give so much time to pieces concerning bullshit politicians and their affairs and so-called celebrities and their nervous breakdowns but they cannot give adequate time to an event that has changed the face of politics and foreign affairs and not to mention the amount of lives that were lost on that day and after. They give just enough time to make someone like prof. Jones look like they can't make a valid point. At least let them answer the question.
'
-
Steven Jones isnt much of an interviewee
He doesnt get to the point very well lol
-
Because, the moment they do that, they give the debunkers the excuse they deperately need to accuse the theorist of being crazy, irrational, or unreasonable, and thereby unqualified to hypothisize or even be taken seriously. This man is smart enough to know this, and maintains his level-headedness. His calm disposition has a strong affect on the open ear, when contrasted against this host's attempt to scramble and distort his material. It's clear it is the reporter who is skirming here.
-
Do you really think it matters if they fell 3 or 4 seconds faster than free-fall speed? If that tower took 20 seconds to fall that would add up to 0,002 of a second per floor. Do you know how fast that is? The only way to move a floor of steel and concrete that fast is with help. Just ask any demolition company (except for control) and they'll tell ya the same thing. By the way, let me know when they fork up all that confiscated video from the Pentagon, hotel & gas station.
-
Dr. Steven Jones!
ROFL!
When is this guy going to ever give up!
By the way, the buildings NEVER collapsed at freefall speed.
Freefall speed is just another twoofer lie.
Even you twoofer messiah Dr. Steven Jones admitted it didn't fall at freefall speed.
-
Occam's Razor. :)
-
Of course people like Tucker are freaking Idiot talking head spin doctors, but man oh man why can't these 9/11 truth folks be a freaking little more persuasive....they simple sit there politily taking bull from the Idiot hosts!!! My God speak up and be forceful or you will never get anywhere on these shows! It take some challenges to get these hosts in a tight spot, use them!
Fight FIRE with FIRE....No wonder the word isn't getting anywhere. DON'T LET THEM WALK ALL OVER YOU!
-
Ya know what's fucked up. Even if the steel melted and made that top part of the Tower fall in, there's no way in hell it would've made the other 96 "undamaged" floors collapse at free-fall speed. What's that a collapse speed of about 0.001 of a second a floor? It's impossible. That's right up there with vanishing in to thin air. I can't believe these fuckers are going to get away with this shit.. All those people...man. I hope this is kept alive until someone pays.
-
I met Steven Jones when he came to Boston, he is a very nice, very honest man.
His science has not been adequately debunked by any means! It was only after reviewing all of the Debunking Arguments made against Dr. Steven Jones and his work that I became 100% absolutely CONVINCED that this was an Inside Job.
There is just absolutely no way that NIST's theory could be true! Not 3 times in one day! It's antiscientific!
Prof. Jones wrote a paper
"Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?" when questioned by the
engineering dept at BYU about his paper not being accurate and not being peer
reviewed he submitted it to scholars for 9/11 truth and peer reviewed it
himself seeing as he is a co-founder scholars for 9/11 truth and is one of the
reviewers he essentially validated his own work.
marksman500 3 years ago
False! 'marksman500' you are wrong. AJ has submitted papers to legitimate peer reviewed journals and his work has withstood the scientific review. He failed the political review/attacks, which is no surprise.
seandulac 3 years ago
..."his work has withstood the scientific review."...
----
I wil stand corrected, if you can provide more detail on who these creditable peers are.
I couldnt find anything..thx
marksman500 3 years ago
stand up! 'Environmental anomalies at the WTC: evidence for energetic materials.'
- published in Springer journal The Environmentalist
'Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction'
- Published in The Open Civil Engineering Journal
seandulac 3 years ago
This is total bullshit. The building shown from Norway collapses from the FIRST FLOOR. WTC 1 and 2 collapsed from the impact floor. So much for your insane liberal conspiricy theories. "Liberalism is a mental disorder".-MSavage
foamulator 4 years ago
That was WTC7 that was shown and it collapses from the ground level. Here we see the level of analysis given to the 'it just fell down' hypothesis. This guy doesn't even know which building were looking at.
seandulac 4 years ago