The Great Zapruder Film Hoax - 1/6

Scientists examined the Zapruder film. They found that, while most of it looks completely genuine, some of the images are impossible. They violate the laws of physics. They could not have come from Zapruders home movie camera.

Zapruders film is a very good forgery. It is almost perfect. Some mistakes took almost 40 years to find.

The scientists also proved that Zapruders film was not just changed a little bit. The whole film is a fake!

A movie film is just a strip of little photos (frames). The fake film was made by cutting and pasting real photos and film frames together to make new frames.

Because the Zapruder film is only 27 seconds long, less than 500 photos needed to be made. The forgers had almost a year to create them, before they were published. This was not difficult to do in 1963 and 1964. People had been creating high quality fake photos since the 1850s!

But what about the people who watched Zapruders film in the days after the assassination?

Film experts believe that a real film of the assassination was quickly altered on the evening of the assassination, using machines that could create Hollywood-style special effects (like Mary Poppins, created in 1964). Since the film was not shown on television, no one knows exactly what these people saw. But we do know that they described a film that is different to the film published in November 1964 as the Zapruder film!

In May 2003, scientists and researchers presented their latest findings at a conference in Duluth, Minnesota. This has now been described in a book, The Great Zapruder Film Hoax, published in September 2003.

The web pages below describe the best proofs that the Zapruder film is a fake. They describe some of the mistakes that the forgers made.

You can save any of these web pages by going to the File / Save As menu on your web browser. The images and small movie clips shown on each page will also be automatically saved with each web page.

If you want more details, please read The Great Zapruder Film Hoax. It contains much more information about the Zapruder film and its forgery. An earlier book, Murder in Dealey Plaza, has more information about the whole assassination and its cover-up.

In the end, you have to decide for yourself what to believe. But dont just believe what the U.S. Government tells you!

* * * * *

COPYRIGHT NOTICE: Video uploaded for nonprofit, educational purposes only under the "fair use" provision of U.S. Code, Title 17, section 107.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Kennedy
• JFK
• Zapruder
• assassination
• film
• hoax
• deception
• fraud
• forgery
• 1963
• Dallas
• photo
• frame
• Mary Poppins

[mike649fox]

@mobydick5296 Also, I do not think that the zapruder film has been faked in anyway.

[mike649fox]

@mobydick5296 You are wrong. It is as simple as that. I beleive that james Fine took the fatal shot. Do some research on him and you'l see that he's impossible to discredit. There is so much evidence for a conspiracy it's a joke. The fact that some people can beleive the warren commissions alleged order of events shows a complete lack of investigation as regards this subject. 

[str8bassin]

@mobydick5296 Thank you for clearing this up for us...you should tell everyone this.

[mobydick5296]

If the Zapruder Film was "faked" as so many people claim, why didn't these "conspirators" alter the movement of Kennedy's head to show foreward movement? I'm sorry folks, but I used to believe this crap for years. I have come to realize how much time I wasted believing in conspiracy theories. There is NO CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE OF CONSPIRACY. Oswald did it, and he did it alone. Period.

[BlueWolfe38]

Zapruder testified before the Warren Commission that the frames published in Commission Exhibit 885 were from the film that he took.

In 1998, Roland Zavada, a product engineer from Kodak who led the team that invented Kodachrome II, studied the film at the behest of the National Archives and concluded that the film was an “in camera original” and that any alleged alterations were not feasible

[BlueWolfe38]

I would like to know what credentials make Jack White a scientist ? What control measures where taken to insure that his science is reliable ? His particular video has been spliced in several places. This video is a joke, as is "assassin science a joke". White is desperate and grasping at straws.

[FutureLaugh]

doesnt the Orville Nix film coincide with the zapruder film?

[tubeyou9878]

So every single American should demand powder residue be searched inside the trunk. The fact is you go to vote for someone and the government kills them.

[tubeyou9878]

The frame 313 on clear harris77 video look at the angle of the exit wound PLus one thing else Jackie said it seemed like the shot came from inside the care. I'm basing it on the exit we can clearly see on video. The video can't lie. The other shooters forget about them. The only place the shot could have come from was the trunk of the car. They don't care if you think other shooters outside the car, but they don't want you to know it came from inside the care, because that means secret service

[DoctorSess]

@tubeyou9878 oh i totally understand... re-read my comment man. Sub Sonic Ammo (Bullets that travel slower than the speed of sound) combined with a suppressor are pretty damn silent but my point's that everyone there that day heard at least 3 shots... so if a suppressor was used it would be to conceal the direction from which the kill shot came. Logically thinking, it doesn't seem necessary... people who actually witnessed it couldn't say for sure what happened anyways hence all the controversy.