Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Popular Mechanics Debunked with EASE!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
2,159
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 18, 2009

And they put this forward as a legitimate publication!...It's embarrassing!

  • likes, 9 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Veloce3)

  • As with all the Government sheeple, the arguments put forward will always be littered with insult and attempts at Ad Hominem. But never any answers!!

  • what makes the whole thing a joke is that steel titanium engines "vaporised" , no where to be seen, no wings broke off, no wreckage of any significance and yet they found bodies. I guess bodies do not vaporise!!

    Anyone that believes the "official" conspiracy theory are as ignorant as can be.

    The PM guy is pathetic.

  • thats right mouthsoap, they say that the whole aircraft "just vaporised" on impact................NUT JOBS!!.....Plain and simple

  • WHO SAYS THE PLANE VAPORISED

    What offical source EVER made this claim?

    NONE - its a truther lie and fair tail, its all you have

    that and your argument from incredulity

    here's a hint, you will never get anywhere in life by saying " I don't believe it, there fore its a lie"

    good luck and fuck off

  • Is PM not an official source then?

    Funny how the Editor in Chief of PM is the Cousin of the Homeland Security Chief at the time. iD CALL THAT AN INDIRECT OFFICIAL LINK!

Top Comments

  • all one needs to do is watch wtc 7 go down. then watch a recorded demolition. if that doesnt tell you something is wrong from start to finish i dont know what will.

see all

All Comments (109)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @HardcoreJungFunk

    April Gallop has a lawsuit and every reason to lie -- there is NO witness statements that support her. There are many witnesses to plane parts, hell, they even found and identified the bodies

  • Im more interested in evidence that flight 77 hit the Pentangon, not evidence for a missile. April Gallop was a witness, she saw along with everyone she spoke to NO plane parts etc herself and none of the people she spoke to there had jet fuel on them and she walked out of the impact hole. If it was a crime scene, when are we going to be shown evidence that it was flight 77 that hit the Pent from the serial numbers of the time-change parts of this plane?

  • @HardcoreJungFunk

    witnesses all agree a plane hit the Pentagon -- convergence of evidence - not one person claims to have seen a missle

    what independent source would you expect to have access to a US crime scene?

  • @Denierbud11 Witness stmts - conflicts all over the place.SO not definitive.

    DNA -yet again another contentious issue.There is NO proper evid of bodies from Flight 77 being IN the Pent.DNA was gath and proc at Dover AFB, NOT the Pent.

    It’s poss to fake rpts on alleged DNA or plant it, would you not agree?

    Its not verifyable by any independent source

    Barbara Olsen ? Were her remains ident from DNA then?The supp phone call from the plane by her toTed was adm by the FBI to have not occured.

  • @Denierbud11 I've already said its up to the US Govt to prove ITS case. The US went to war based on this,. Again , the 100 tonnes of 757at the Pentagon?- where's the wreckage and where's the evidence from the serial numbers of the time-change parts?

    The people tried and convicted, presume you're talikng about the Guantanamo detainees who were tortured - wasn't that a milit court not a public court? So the Gen pub dont get to scrutinise the evid. we just have to take the US govts word for it.

  • @HardcoreJungFunk

    the evidence is the evidence -- much of it in the public domain -- like witness statements

    there have in fact been people charged, tried and convicted, you must be quoting from an old truther site -- or you are just an ignorant fool

    the DNA from every person at the Pentagon has been verified with one exception, a small child was not located -- there are reports from the Arlington Fire Department concerning the crash, that is in the public domain, have you looked at it?

  • @Denierbud11 "I believe the evidence" what evidence? Its up to the US Govt to prove its case NOT the general public.All they've done is told us what has happened, and no-one had been charged publicly for 9/11. Theres NO transparency.

    The Govt WILL NOT provide evidence that the wreckage at the Pentagon was from Flight 77, so we are just expected to take their word for it- NO WAY.

    Wheres the 100 tonnnes of 757 wreck? Thats "evidence" .Tell me what happens to wreckage after ALL plane crashes?

  • @HardcoreJungFunk

    no, I believe the evidence

    something you do not have

    prove flight 77 did not crash -- provide a plausible alternative -- explain how four flights could be created from nothing

    betcha can't

  • @Denierbud11

    If you look I did reply but I posted the "random shit" by mistake also. YOU believe anything the Govt tells you -THATS gullible  if not you are just paid to defend the indefensible. Everything needs to be questioned as the US Govt is so secretive.

    Explain to me about the wreckage of flight 77 , the 100 tonnes ,where is it ?!

  • @HardcoreJungFunk

    If you want to have a discussion, you have to reply to me, not just post random shit

    gullible is a truther trait, you believe anything seen on youtube that supports your belief

    think about this -- do you really beleive those flights did not exist? think of how many people would have direct knowledge of the flights ... travel agents, the air lines, FAA, NTSB, the air ports -- thousands of individuals -- this is so stupid

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more