United States Senators for 911 TRUTH
Uploader Comments (1ThatWants911truth)
Top Comments
-
In the light that we were promised a transparent Government, lets shine the light on the 911 investigations and open the books for all to see. Why all the secrets if there's nothing to hide? I suspect Georgey boy is hiding in Texas praying to God that he's not led to the Gallows (along with Dickie and a few others). I say let the investigations, then the trials begin. We're overdue for a good public hanging.
-
What a great man.
Much Respect for saying the truth.
All Comments (43)
-
@Berkeley626 People with the courage to stand up to criminals piss you off. Mass murder no real investigation? A farce investigation for 3000 lives. You got justice figured out. You must one day see you are helping mass murderers adopting the official 911 gov fairy tale.
-
"come here:
truthknowledge. com
I'm exposing the strategy to manipulate your mind! For it's far more important to expose the game than it is to simply expose those responsible, the players or puppets. Welcome to the REAL world.
Join me on Facebook
When millions lock in that pyramid will flip upside down.
My Religion is the Religion of Reality, Religion of Critical Thinking, Religion of Humanity, Religion of Liberty, Religion of Truth. "
-
And This Is What Is Being Used For All The Killings ?
-
I'm sick of truthers inflating the resumes of their supporters. One state senator does not make "United States Senators." First of all, "one" doesn't equate with several ("senators" is plural), and a United States Senator is a federal senator from Congress, not some wackjob state senator.
-
@grandmastershek The evidence is easily measurable, and it's all over YT. I cite NIST's own report, and you cite NO evidence of a predicted global collapse, and yet, you act SURPRISED that people are mystified by this inexplicable event.
I've read the evidence, especially NIST's report, which does so much drylabbing, I can't believe you swallowed it.
Where are the sheer plates in NIST's model. In fact, where is the DATA?
NIST is the one making unsupportable claims.
-
@OneVoiceMore" the building was -QUICKLY- approaching free fall."
Why is it that you people just make claims and provide 0 evidence to support it?
FYI- There were signs that the building was failing all afternoon as per the FDNY (Chris Boyle, Rudolph Weidner, Nicole Ferrell). We then visually see it failing as the penthouse collapses, then we have the external collapse.
-
@OneVoiceMore "NIST tried to leave this info out.."
And I suppose tou have evidence to support this conclusions?
"here shouldn't have been ANY free fall,"
According to?
"Symmetrical free fall for 108 feet. You can pretend like that's somehow okay, but all that makes you is ignorant."
Bare assertion fallacy.
-
@grandmastershek Wrong. NIST tried to leave this info out. They got busted.
There shouldn't have been ANY free fall, and they desperately tried to pretend there WASN'T. You're reading the UNREVISED report. Go check out figure 3-15.
Symmetrical free fall for 108 feet. You can pretend like that's somehow okay, but all that makes you is ignorant.
And you abbreviated the facts to sound glib. Don't fear the truth.
Those buildings were brought down by more than planes and fire.
-
@grandmastershek Apparently, you haven't read the report.
But, let's keep it on target for you.
There shouldn't have been ANY free fall, much less for over a hundred feet. You leave out THAT inconvenient fact from your reasoning.
Pssssst. Go jump off a building 108 feet tall. See if that seems insignificant. Oh, and try not to ignore that for the 1.75 BEFORE that, the building was -QUICKLY- approaching free fall.
Impossible to explain with EXPECTED levels of column support.
please get this video out! It's important
1ThatWants911truth 2 years ago 3