Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Who is a nuclear threat to the United States?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
166,448
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 23, 2007

We are once again being told to piss ourselves because a country might get their hands on some nukes in the future.

Here's something to think about before you hit the war panic button.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 216 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (957)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • .....and exactly who wants to " invade "the USA ??? they would be tomahawked to death before breakfast ! it is simply not possible to invade ! its full of...." Americans " anyway !

    And isnt there an SSBN or 3 still parked just off Certain Coastlines ??? Besides all this, the Chinese have found the correct method. Buy the joint . They even have a receipt ...lolmao.

  • BECOUSE YOU HAVE TO HAVE THE MEN IN POWER TO DO IT AND RIGHT NOW WE HAVE LADY GAGA SO STORE GUNS N FOOD UP FOR SHIT TIMES TO COME DONT TAKE ANY FLU SHOTS OR WOODEN NICKLES RED LIST SHIT DEATH SAME BLUE N YELLOW NO FEMA CAMPS FOR ME AND I WOULD PRESS THE BUTTON BUT THEN IM NOT LADY GAGA. GHOST! PS LOOK UP ALEX JONES.PEACE!

  • This is so idiotic....if there would be fullscale nuclear war between US and Russia, there wouldnt be any winners....every1 would loose....we all know that both Russia and US have enough nukes to blow eachother back to stone age and the world would suffer from massive fallout and nuclear winter....

    As for terrorists, they dont represent any one nation...terrorists have cells all over the world, thus if terrorsit would attack with nukes, you cant strike back at them with nukes...

  • @sertox12345 Nothing wrong with spending money on defense budget. What's ur point? During WW2 we also produced the most material, we were known as the arsenal of democracy. If it were up to me we'd spend MORE money to modernize our nuclear arsenal.

    On china, yes I agree we should tariff all their imports because they refuse to raise the value of their currency. I believe in FAIR trade, not FREE trade for china.

  • on china we should tax every thing comming into the usa ever contry does that but we dont y its sick they bring in trash billions and we dont tax come on they ship 10 cars to the usa to our 2 tax tax tax them let put a hold on them while we still can

  • @damiion666 facts  United States 698,105,000,000 4.7% 2 People's Republic of China 114,000,000,000 2.2% 3 France 61,285,000,000 2.5% 4 United Kingdom 57,424,000,000 2.7% 5 Russia 52,586,000,000 4.3% 6 Japan 51,420,000,000 1.0% 7 Germany 46,848,000,000 1.4% 8 Saudi Arabia 39,200,000,000 11.2% 9 Italy 38,303,000,000 1.8% 10 India 36,030,000,000 1.8% 11 Brazil 27,120,000,000 1.6% 12 Australia 26,900,000,000 1.9% 13 South Korea 26,550,000,00
  • @damiion666 can you tell me how that is true when the usa spends more than all the contrys put together lol are armed to the teeth can you show me ## i would like to see real ## than i will show you what the usa## are look you guys are going to become a team with the usa in the future look at chine and iran that is what you should b looking at dont trush them never

  • @zulle83 As for having natural resources, it makes a big difference on a nation's ability to rebound quickly. Look at russia and how it rose out of the ashes of the USSR. It had vast reserves of oil it could rely on. U cant compare zaire to the U.S. We have more than just one natural resource, and won't tolerate such regimes and American citizens, nevermind the military, are armed to the teeth to allow any dictator or foreign power to just walk in and take what they want.

  • @zulle83 I would rather have al qaeda infiltrate a government and have it run said nation than to have it as an underground insurgency. Having them out in the open and holding governments accountable would be easier to target and annihilate and hold accountable.

  • @damiion666 the point is: 1- having natural resources doesn't mean you'll be a rich country in the future.

    2- i know lybia was more a french affair, but USA had the "leadership from behind" (not my words). the whole strategy of the war against terrorism is failing. in fact it's just destabilizing countries killing regimes, making possible for al qaeda to infiltrate in those countries and giving the political power to the only well organized party in the whole arab world: Muslim Brotherhood.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more