Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

AR Health Dept Legal Vaccination Denial Call Part 2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
473 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 26, 2009

Part 2: This is a phone call from 17Jun09 to the legal council at the Arkansas State Health Department...it was not pretty!! He basically said mandatory vaccinations are constitutional!!!!!!

Originally from:
http://www.dailymotion.com/user/guyrazer/video/x9m6b1_working-copy-ar-health-...

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (28)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @fsoiberg it's nothing to do with what it's "labelled" it's to do with.. you know.. WHAT IT ACTUALLY DOES!! We call Sodium-Chloride "salt" because... it makes things taste salty. You do sprinkle it on your food despite the fact chlorine is a deadly toxin on its own. This is beside the point however - if we deliberately add something, it is not a contaminant BY DEFINITION. No one is injecting people with pure mercury. You've got a lot of reading to do. Get to.

  • @dj2baduk "Thimerosal is not a contaminant, it is a preservative..."

    If I label ARSENIC; Artificial Sweetener, will you sprinkle it on your cereal, or add it to your coffee? I hope not…

  • @dj2baduk I gave you three videos and you think all the research I have done is in one video. My inability to sway you is due to your refusal to see. Obviously you failed to comprehend the 60 Minuets video where it explains that the Swine Flu Vaccine of 1976 was switched after testing with one that was not tested. In Global Vaccine Agenda it explains that the first trial of Mercury was 100% fatal. Eugenics is not new its practitioners have been murdering people for decades if not longer.

  • @fsoiberg vaccines are extensively screened. Thimerosal is not a contaminant, it is a preservative and it is, according to numerous clinical trials, completely harmless - metabolising as ethyl-mercury and passing easily and quickly from the body.

    You have no hope of "swaying" me if you keep quoting the opinions and cherry-picked pseudo-science of demonstrable crackpots or purveyors of "alternative" treatments. It's easy to find out how bogus these claims are nowadays.There's really no excuse.

  • @dj2baduk Theoretical vaccines never harm anyone, only contaminated ones do harm, and once injected can never be removed. Contaminants include: SV40, hCG, MSG, Pestivirus, Viral fragments, Thimerosal (mercury), and there is no way of knowing what other contaminants can and will be introduced. The contaminants can be effective even if the vaccine is not. If you work for Big Pharma I have no hope of swaying you. I can only hope to sway those who are open. Thank you for providing that opportunity.

  • @fsoiberg how revealing that you assume other people blindly take one person's word on something without doing any research. One retired neuro-surgeon's opinion doesn't mean squat compared with peer reviewed scientific literature. It means even less when he's selling his own books and unproven, unscientific alternative remedies. I could debunk just about every one of Blailock's claims using... the same scientific literature he cherry picks for the things he "uncovers". Why don't you?

  • @dj2baduk I take it from your comment that you think a news anchor reading from a teleprompter with no firsthand experience of what they are reading day after day, week after week, year after year, is equal to a doctor providing firsthand medical practice experience and research. Try Google: “Vaccines and Brain Development” and “Global Vaccines Agenda”. URL's are not allowed... You'll have to do the search yourself...

  • @dj2baduk I'm not the one refusing to look... Try this: "BANNED - 60 Minutes SWINE FLU VACCINE" URL's are not allowed... You'll have to do the search yourself...

  • @fsoiberg "Demanding proof and refusing to view the evidence is a paradox"

    What evidence? If you want to send me a link then do so, but you haven't even supplied that so far and don't you think claiming my views on vaccination come from corporate controlled media while pointing me at YouTube videos is just the teensiest bit paradoxical? Hmmm?

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more