Enki Sumerian Tablet Translation Ch.4 2of5

The tablets were found in what's now modern day Iraq. Famous locations where a lot of tablets in ancient libraries were found: Sippar, Nippur and Nineveh. Sitchin used well over 800 Sumerian, Mesopotamian, Akkadian, Babylonian and Assyrian sources for this collection. He named this bundle of tablets he selected 'The Lost Book of Enki'

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Enki
• Tablet
• Translations
• This
• collection
• of
• clay
• tablets
• are
• interpretations
• done
• by
• Zacharia
• Sitchin.

[scumbagcabbie]

where is exactly the planet endu

[squibblejack]

Your thinking of Star Wars DH. This is the book of enki.

[Hobble]

@cartersbenefits Can you provide a source for this information? As for there being a consensus on these translations, that's not true, most who have taken to translating the Sumerian tablets consider Sitchin's translation to be inaccurate.

[Hobble]

@cartersbenefits Alright, I'll watch it. However, even if that's true, how is that evidence for aliens? There's quite a lot of other possibilities.

[cartersbenefits]

@Hobble What you're telling me in so many words is you haven't really looked very deep at it all... watch the Revelations of the Pyramids for example, in full...perhaps a couple times....and then tell me you don't have more questions.... such as Easter Island connecting to Nazca connecting to Giza in a perfectly straight line.....at exactly at 30 degree angle to the equator for instance.... that's kind of hard to just ignore, considering they all have similar traits and stone work.

[Hobble]

@cartersbenefits The description of planets is one of the exaggerations. The consensus is that the Sumerian's knew of 5 planets, only the ancient astronaut theorists claim that they knew of more. Pyramids are not evidence of anything but pyramids. AA theorists usually present that point as if the pyramids started popping up around the same time, but there were 10's of thousands of years between different cultures building them. Besides, how is any of that evidence of aliens?

[cartersbenefits]

@Hobble Besides that, proven or not, how can you just discount it....there's way to many questions open now...besides look at all the pyramids around the world for instance....there's so much more, if you can just discard all this, it says to me that you haven't seen most of the correlations I'm talking about...such as the accurate description of undiscovered planets in a published book.... that's hard to just completely ignore...period!

[cartersbenefits]

@Hobble However, Sitchin did accurately describe the color and composition of Neptune and Uranus in his published books year before Voyager took photographs that would supposedly be the first viable images that humankind has had of those planets...hard to deny that.... and if you are acting as it their is no consensus on these translations. Sitchin isn't the only one....Sitchin extends the theory to much more detail, however, overall many or in agreement on much of the translation at least...

[Hobble]

@cartersbenefits These translations aren't confirming anything, because they're not accurate. Sitchin released these in a book, where he noted that it was to be taken as a work of FICTION. And the only archaeological "evidence" is based completely on interpretation, and/or exaggerations.

[cartersbenefits]

@rightrightminyo but what you're also saying is that we ourselves have gone to space...but still don't know of a better way to mine gold...!! Think about how that sounds. And no, they may not have needed are superior mindset, there's lots of different reasons we may have been better suited for such task.....perhaps we were more conditioned to the environment for instance.

[cartersbenefits]

@Hobble these translations are really just confirming all the pre existing archeological evidence....there's way too many correlations to just ignore, this all makes quite a bit of sense

[cartersbenefits]

@rightrightminyo i dont think that you have a brain is what it is...