no i said 2 mil was ridiculous, or if you prefer outrageous. you are confused. i am not a dem. that is why i mentioned the sanctions, clinton upheld them also and like you said bombed the shit out of them for 8 yrs. but back to the point. you are the one who mentioned clinton as a justification for bushs actions. and you failed to address my point about who gave saddam the weapons that killed all of those people.
That is only becuase you listen to the lefty media. So 2 million is o.k. then since that is what you believe from your leftist media, a much more tollerable number I suppose. Didn't Bill Clinton bomb a school in Iraq? That was o.k. since he was a Dem.
10 million???, the highest figure ive ever seen is 2 million which is still ridiculous. It is however a fact, that you can check, that about 500,000 children died as a DIRECT result of sanctions proposed by the US and emposed by the UN. And by the way, how many of those 2 million were killed with weapons Bush Sr. and Rumsfeld sold Saddam in the 80's when they supported this murderous tyrant? I
Leftists and Islamists have been marching in lock-step agreement with each other on all matters of US surrender since September 11, 2001. Is your ignorance feigned or genuine?
Saddaam killing 10 million of his own people isn't good enough justification for you either I suppose. You obviously too uneducated to understand why we are there.
Bill Clinton: "I supported the president when he asked for authority to stand up against weapons of mass destruction in Iraq," he said in May 2003, the same year he was quoted praising Bush's handling of the war. In a June 2004 article in Time magazine, Clinton also suggested that he would have acted the same way Bush did.
WOW these guys look and sound like they know something??????????????? lmao
hershbergerpaul 3 years ago
no i said 2 mil was ridiculous, or if you prefer outrageous. you are confused. i am not a dem. that is why i mentioned the sanctions, clinton upheld them also and like you said bombed the shit out of them for 8 yrs. but back to the point. you are the one who mentioned clinton as a justification for bushs actions. and you failed to address my point about who gave saddam the weapons that killed all of those people.
mcalien24 4 years ago
That is only becuase you listen to the lefty media. So 2 million is o.k. then since that is what you believe from your leftist media, a much more tollerable number I suppose. Didn't Bill Clinton bomb a school in Iraq? That was o.k. since he was a Dem.
tony50195 4 years ago
10 million???, the highest figure ive ever seen is 2 million which is still ridiculous. It is however a fact, that you can check, that about 500,000 children died as a DIRECT result of sanctions proposed by the US and emposed by the UN. And by the way, how many of those 2 million were killed with weapons Bush Sr. and Rumsfeld sold Saddam in the 80's when they supported this murderous tyrant? I
mcalien24 4 years ago
Leftists and Islamists have been marching in lock-step agreement with each other on all matters of US surrender since September 11, 2001. Is your ignorance feigned or genuine?
Pictures here: zombietime . com
TylerNull 4 years ago
Saddaam killing 10 million of his own people isn't good enough justification for you either I suppose. You obviously too uneducated to understand why we are there.
tony50195 4 years ago
you think these people interviewed are leftists? you are a bad joke on reason.
mcalien24 4 years ago
wow that justifies everything
mcalien24 4 years ago
The entire present population of Japan might agree with that remark.
TAMARLANE 4 years ago
Bill Clinton: "I supported the president when he asked for authority to stand up against weapons of mass destruction in Iraq," he said in May 2003, the same year he was quoted praising Bush's handling of the war. In a June 2004 article in Time magazine, Clinton also suggested that he would have acted the same way Bush did.
tony50195 4 years ago