Four questions to answer in life - Dr. Ravi Zacharias

http://www.rzim.org

PLAYLIST HERE:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvghod2uv_0&feature=&p=226C0F2391D4665...

Ravi Zacharias International Ministries

Lecture about 'Can Man live without God?' from the 'National University of Singapore'

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Dr. Ravi Zacharias
• RZIM
• Can Man live without God

[polopowers1]

Logic is not faith.Christ called the preaching of the cross foolishness, not logical.Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger then men. For since in the wisdom of God the world through wisdom did not know God ! It pleased God through foolishness of the message to save. Ravi suggests if you intellectually look at Christ you will believe, no.Morality is not God. Ravi suggests He is. God is above morality.Objective reason does not equal faith

[HushAndLearn]

@polopowers1 -Because those passages are speaking about the fool (from the humanistic perspective) who don't want to repent. A good example will be to look at atheists' arguments who find out all this salvation process to be unreasonable by not trying to grasp the reason of it.

Regards.

[MegaCrazyTaxiDriver]

Religion -- the biggest logical inconsistency in the world. Hasn't provided humanity with new knowledge since the discovery of the scientific method.

[zonworks]

@polopowers1 Wow... where did u get this explanation? From your own logic? You seemed to know God personally. But for me I choose to put my faith where it is logical, rather than put faith in blind guides!

[polopowers1]

@kitno84 Paul's word is Christ word though Christ did not speak it.There is no Ravi way and God's way when your representing Christ as a speaker

[kitno84]

@polopowers1 I think Ravi is saying that Atheism fails his three tests for truth (0:25 through 1:00). By the way, Paul said that the preaching of the cross is foolishness in 1 Corinthians; I do not know if Christ said a similar thing.

[HushAndLearn]

@FrankieSayRelaxxx1 >>Obviously you are pulling facts out of your ass. I like how you just flicked over everything I said about the ice cores without really responding to them

--I thought you knew about how ice cores formed by warm/cold temperatures, I guess you didn't.

>>I'm finished with this conversation. You are a highly prejudiced, ignorant and closed-minded individual

--Ok, good luck in your journey.

The way to barrier the truth is to assume you already have it.

Regards.

[HushAndLearn]

@FrankieSayRelaxxx1 >>If Dendrochronology is so unreliable then how come it gives dates that are consistent with ALL other forms of radiometric dating?

--The misconception here comes by assuming linear weather or guessing climates. The problem using isotopes to date something is by using those unreliable premises. An example would be if you get into a room & see a candle burning, the problem is that they don't know if the burning time is linear base on several factors nor its original height.