Jon Huntsman grilling Mitt Romney on serving the United States. Getting applause. MSNBC HD

Mitt Romney roasted by Jon Huntsman on serving the country under Barack Obama's administration. Jon Huntsman served under a Democratic administration because he wants to help get the country back in track as fast as possible whether it is working for a Republican, Democratic, or Independent party. This was at the MSNBC Facebook Republican Debate 1-8-12

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Newt Gingrich
• Iowa
• 99
• counties
• sioux
• city
• Barack
• obama
• Bill
• O'reilly
• Joe
• Biden
• Hilary
• Clinton
• Sean
• Hannity
• whiner
• baby
• negative
• advertising
• ads
• positive
• win
• New
• Hampshire
• granite
• state
• election
• 2012
• Jon
• Huntsman
• Rick
• Santorum
• Perry
• Michele
• Bachmann
• George
• W.
• Bush
• Dick
• Cheney
• Megyn
• Kelly
• Chris
• Wallace
• Neil
• Cavuto
• Sarah
• Palin
• Republican
• Party
• United
• States
• of
• America
• Democrat
• Commercial
• Kennedy
• facebook
• google

[Philhelm]

What was being said at the end of this video?

[Zapdos4144]

@Philhelm Last part was "finding a solution to our problem"

[daniawl]

@suceress Good to hear a politician be a politician. Cool story bro. What they say means nothing. Ultimately, it's how much power they take for themselves and who they surround themselves with. Ron Paul would destroy this country. Jon Huntsman wouldn't do much because he's unreliable and a poor speaker. He tried consistently to be a smart ass and kind of failed obviously. Being a smart ass in debates will not get people to vote for you.

[daniawl]

@JackyB92 Both Paul and Huntsman would make terrible presidents. As a republican, I'd much rather have Huntsman as Ron Paul would literally destroy America. Huntsman just seems a bit unreliable and was pretty poor in debates.

[daniawl]

Jon Huntsman seemed to fall under pressure. Not sure if he even took it seriously, because he seemed to be terrible at campaigning and debates. Smart guy, but tried too hard to be a smart ass.

[doronster195]

And now he endorses Romney? Political sell-out if I ever seen one.

[MrTheDJJD]

Putting country first, sounds nice and pretty, but to be honest I'd rather have a CIVIL REPRESENTATIVE than a COUNTRY OFFICIAL. We need a representative, not a leader. If they stand for the "country," they have to put people first. The people ARE this country.

I'd also like to say that @jackyb92, he has no baggage whatsoever. The newsletters written under his name have been the only forms of slander against Paul. Jon Huntsman was in a strange place. Ambassador to China?

[suceress]

What Romney said translated to me that he doesn't care about anyone but conservatives and Republicans. He values his agenda over the well-being and rights of other citizens. It's disgusting. But at least he isn't as despicable as Gingrich or Santorum. I wish it didn't have to be one party vs another and that there really was realistically room for a middle ground.

[suceress]

I met Huntsman when he was the Ambassador to Singapore back in the 90s. He was always very gracious, humorous, and kind. His wife is a sweetheart and created calligraphy thank you awards by hand for people who helped out with various things-- such as volunteer tax consultants. I'm pleased to see he isn't interested in blindly towing the party line just because it is for that particular party. The Us vs Them attitude is sickening.

[bangbangboom234]

HUNTSMAN 2012

[JackyB92]

Ron Paul has too much baggage with the newsletters and everything (whether he wrote them or not it looks bad), Jon Huntsman doesn't have any of that and would thus be a better choice to challenge Pres. Obama. Don't get me wrong I respect Paul, he has stuck to his views for years now without ever changing them depending on what audience he is in front of and he does have some valid points about the economy, but I would feel far more comfortable voting for Huntsman than Paul.